Where next with revalidation?
作者信息
Norcini John J
出版信息
BMJ. 2005 Jun 25;330(7506):1458-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7506.1458.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Where next with revalidation?再认证的下一步是什么？
BMJ. 2005 Jun 25;330(7506):1458-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7506.1458.
2
Mechanisms of revalidation.重新验证的机制。
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Aug;55(517):640-1.
3
Revalidation for general practitioners: randomised comparison of two revalidation models.全科医生再认证：两种再认证模式的随机对照比较。
BMJ. 2004 Mar 20;328(7441):687-91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7441.687.
4
Doctors in difficulty and revalidation: where next for the medical profession?陷入困境与重新认证的医生：医疗行业的下一步走向何方？
Med Educ. 2009 Jul;43(7):611-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03387.x.
5
Continuing medical education and professional revalidation in Europe: five case examples.欧洲的继续医学教育与专业再认证：五个案例
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009 Winter;29(1):58-62. doi: 10.1002/chp.20007.
6
Revalidation rules are clear for most, but not for the exceptions.重新验证规则对大多数情况来说是明确的，但不适用于例外情况。
Nurs Stand. 2015 Dec 9;30(15):31. doi: 10.7748/ns.30.15.31.s44.
7
Making a start on revalidation.开始重新认证。
Emerg Nurse. 2016 Apr;24(1):5. doi: 10.7748/en.24.1.5.s1.
8
Where next with revalidation? Smart money is on using new communications technology effectively.再认证的下一步是什么？明智的做法是有效利用新的通信技术。
BMJ. 2005 Aug 6;331(7512):352. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7512.352-b.
9
Where next with revalidation? Make CME and CPD compulsory with support of audit and mentoring.再认证的下一步是什么？在审核和指导的支持下，将继续医学教育和持续专业发展设为强制性要求。
BMJ. 2005 Aug 6;331(7512):352-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7512.352-c.
10
Revalidation for doctors. Should reflect doctors' performance and continuing professional development.医生重新认证。应反映医生的表现和持续专业发展。
BMJ. 1998 Oct 24;317(7166):1094-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7166.1094.
引用本文的文献
1
Where next with revalidation? Smart money is on using new communications technology effectively.再认证的下一步是什么？明智的做法是有效利用新的通信技术。
BMJ. 2005 Aug 6;331(7512):352. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7512.352-b.
本文引用的文献
1
Current perspectives in assessment: the assessment of performance at work.评估的当前视角：工作绩效评估
Med Educ. 2005 Sep;39(9):880-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02182.x.
2
Time for radical reform.是时候进行彻底改革了。
BMJ. 2005 Jun 25;330(7506):1504-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7506.1504.
3
Obstacles to maintaining licensure in the United States.在美国维持执照的障碍。
BMJ. 2005 Jun 18;330(7505):1443-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7505.1443.
4
A way forward.前进的道路。
BMJ. 2005 Jun 4;330(7503):1326-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7503.1326.
5
Patients, professionalism, and revalidation.患者、专业素养与重新验证
BMJ. 2005 May 28;330(7502):1265-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7502.1265.
6
Building on the GMC's achievements.基于英国医学总会的成就。
BMJ. 2005 May 21;330(7501):1205-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7501.1205.
7
Failure to act on good intentions.未能将善意付诸行动。
BMJ. 2005 May 14;330(7500):1144-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7500.1144.
8
Systematic review: the relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care.系统评价：临床经验与医疗质量之间的关系
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Feb 15;142(4):260-73. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-4-200502150-00008.
9
The role of physician specialty board certification status in the quality movement.医生专业委员会认证状态在质量改进运动中的作用。
JAMA. 2004 Sep 1;292(9):1038-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.9.1038.
10
Impact studies in continuing education for health professions: update.卫生专业继续教育的影响研究：最新情况
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2003 Summer;23(3):146-56. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340230305.
Zotero 插件