Wright John, Parry Jayne, Scully Edward
Health Impact Assessment Research Unit, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, England.
Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Jun;83(6):472-7. Epub 2005 Jun 17.
European Union (EU) Member States are interested in using health impact assessment (HIA) as a means of safeguarding their obligations to protect human health under the 1997 Treaty of Amsterdam. However, several have encountered difficulties institutionalizing HIA with the policy-making process. As a consequence, the World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe has suggested coupling HIA with strategic environmental assessment (SEA). Traditionally, the incorporation of HIA into other forms of impact assessment has been resisted, for fear of losing its focus on health issues to environmental concerns, and compromising its social model of health with the introduction of biophysical indicators. But can these fears be substantiated? In this paper, we investigate the grounds for such concerns by reviewing the relevant policy documents and departmental guidelines of four non-European countries that have considered the use of integrated assessment. We found that the case for associating HIA with SEA in Europe is strong, and offers potential solutions to problems of screening, theoretical framework, causal pathways and ready entry to the policy process. Coupling HIA with SEA may thus be the next step forward in a longer journey towards institutionalizing HIA as an independent policy-linked device.
欧盟成员国有意将健康影响评估(HIA)作为履行其根据1997年《阿姆斯特丹条约》保护人类健康义务的一种手段。然而,一些国家在将健康影响评估纳入决策过程的制度化方面遇到了困难。因此,世界卫生组织(WHO)欧洲区域办事处建议将健康影响评估与战略环境评估(SEA)相结合。传统上,人们一直抵制将健康影响评估纳入其他形式的影响评估,因为担心它会因关注环境问题而失去对健康问题的关注,并且引入生物物理指标会损害其健康社会模式。但这些担忧有根据吗?在本文中,我们通过审查四个考虑使用综合评估的非欧洲国家的相关政策文件和部门指南,来研究这些担忧的依据。我们发现,在欧洲将健康影响评估与战略环境评估相结合的理由很充分,并且为筛选、理论框架、因果路径以及顺利进入政策过程等问题提供了潜在的解决方案。因此,将健康影响评估与战略环境评估相结合可能是朝着将健康影响评估作为一种独立的与政策相关手段制度化的漫长进程中的下一步。