School for Health, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Jun;64(6):478-87. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.094300.
European policymakers have recently become increasingly committed to using Impact Assessment (IA) to inform policy decisions. Welcoming this development, the public health community has not yet paid sufficient attention to conceptual concerns about IA or to corporate efforts to shape the way in which IA is used. This essay is a thematic analysis of literature concerning IA and associated tools and a related assessment of the European Union's (EU) new 'integrated' IA tool. Eight key concerns regarding IA are identified from the literature, many of which relate to the potential for undue corporate influence. Assessment of the EU's IA tool suggests that many of these concerns are valid. The findings raise crucial questions about the role of IA in public policy. By focusing mainly on the impact on the economy and business environment, the EU's current approach to IA may undermine healthy public policy. Those interested in public health need to acknowledge and respond to the problems associated with IA and evaluate the effects of 'integrated' IA tools on policy decisions affecting public health.
欧洲政策制定者最近越来越致力于使用影响评估(IA)来为政策决策提供信息。公共卫生界欢迎这一发展,但尚未充分关注关于 IA 的概念性问题,也未关注企业在塑造 IA 使用方式方面所做的努力。本文是对与 IA 及相关工具相关文献的主题分析,以及对欧盟新的“综合”IA 工具的相关评估。本文从文献中确定了八项与 IA 相关的关键问题,其中许多与企业不当影响的可能性有关。对欧盟 IA 工具的评估表明,其中许多担忧是合理的。这些发现对 IA 在公共政策中的作用提出了至关重要的问题。欧盟目前的 IA 方法主要侧重于对经济和商业环境的影响,这可能会破坏健康的公共政策。关注公共卫生的人需要认识到与 IA 相关的问题并做出回应,并评估“综合”IA 工具对影响公共卫生的政策决策的影响。