Troendle James F
Biometry and Mathematical Statistics Branch, Division of Epidemiology, Statistics, and Prevention Research, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Stat Med. 2005 Dec 15;24(23):3581-91. doi: 10.1002/sim.2202.
The problem of adjusting for multiplicity when one has multiple outcome variables can be handled quite nicely by step-down permutation tests. More difficult is the problem when one wants an analysis of each outcome variable to be adjusted for some covariates and the outcome variables are Bernoulli. Special permutations can be used where the outcome vectors are permuted within each strata of the data defined by the levels of the (made discrete) covariates. This method is described and shown to control the familywise error rate at any prespecified level. The method is compared through simulation to a vector bootstrap approach, also using a step-down testing procedure. It is seen that the method using permutations within strata is superior to the vector bootstrap in terms of error control and power. The method is illustrated on a data set of 55 minor malformations of babies of diabetic and non-diabetic mothers.
当存在多个结果变量时,通过逐步置换检验可以很好地处理多重性调整问题。当希望对每个结果变量的分析针对一些协变量进行调整且结果变量为伯努利变量时,问题会更加困难。可以使用特殊的置换方法,其中结果向量在由(离散化后的)协变量水平定义的数据的每个分层内进行置换。本文描述了该方法,并表明它可以将族系错误率控制在任何预先指定的水平。通过模拟将该方法与向量自举法进行比较,向量自举法也使用逐步检验程序。可以看出,在误差控制和功效方面,分层内使用置换的方法优于向量自举法。该方法在一个包含糖尿病和非糖尿病母亲所生婴儿的55种轻微畸形的数据集上进行了说明。