Jones Esyllt W
Institute of Historical Research, University of London.
Can Bull Med Hist. 2005;22(1):57-82. doi: 10.3138/cbmh.22.1.57.
Unlike occurrences of other contagious diseases such as cholera and smallpox, the 1918-19 influenza pandemic did not lead to anti-immigrant backlash, the stigmatization of newcomers as disease carriers, or aggressive quarantine measures focused against immigrant groups. During influenza outbreaks in several major Canadian cities, quarantine was either rejected or was a low-priority containment measure, reluctantly and sceptically employed. Blaming immigrants during the epidemic was not considered enlightened public health practice or good disease containment strategy. Retrospective evaluation of the successes and failures of the fight against influenza concluded that coercive measures such as quarantine did more harm than good. The experience with influenza contributed to new notions of immigrant inclusion in the social body.
与霍乱和天花等其他传染病的情况不同,1918 - 19年的流感大流行并未引发反移民的强烈抵制、将新移民污名化为疾病携带者,或针对移民群体采取激进的隔离措施。在加拿大几个主要城市的流感爆发期间,隔离措施要么被拒绝,要么是一项低优先级的控制措施,实施时很不情愿且充满怀疑。在疫情期间指责移民并不被视为明智的公共卫生做法或良好的疾病控制策略。对对抗流感的成败进行的回顾性评估得出结论,诸如隔离等强制性措施弊大于利。流感疫情的经历促成了将移民纳入社会群体的新观念。