Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Sardinia, Italy.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2013 Feb;19(2):254-9. doi: 10.3201/eid1902.120312.
In the new millennium, the centuries-old strategy of quarantine is becoming a powerful component of the public health response to emerging and reemerging infectious diseases. During the 2003 pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome, the use of quarantine, border controls, contact tracing, and surveillance proved effective in containing the global threat in just over 3 months. For centuries, these practices have been the cornerstone of organized responses to infectious disease outbreaks. However, the use of quarantine and other measures for controlling epidemic diseases has always been controversial because such strategies raise political, ethical, and socioeconomic issues and require a careful balance between public interest and individual rights. In a globalized world that is becoming ever more vulnerable to communicable diseases, a historical perspective can help clarify the use and implications of a still-valid public health strategy.
在新千年,隔离这一存在了数个世纪的策略,正成为公共卫生应对新发和再现传染病的有力手段。在 2003 年严重急性呼吸综合征大流行期间,隔离、边境管控、接触者追踪和监测的使用,仅用 3 个多月就成功遏制了这一全球性威胁。几个世纪以来,这些措施一直是应对传染病暴发的组织性应对措施的基石。然而,隔离和其他控制传染病的措施的使用一直存在争议,因为这些策略引发了政治、伦理和社会经济问题,需要在公共利益和个人权利之间谨慎平衡。在一个日益容易受到传染病影响的全球化世界中,历史视角可以帮助澄清仍然有效的公共卫生策略的使用和影响。