• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项剂量递增试验,比较缓释地尔硫䓬与氢氯噻嗪联合用药和单药治疗原发性高血压患者的疗效。

A dose escalation trial comparing the combination of diltiazem SR and hydrochlorothiazide with the monotherapies in patients with essential hypertension.

作者信息

Weir M R, Weber M A, Punzi H A, Serfer H M, Rosenblatt S, Cady W J

机构信息

University of Maryland Hospital, Baltimore 21201.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 1992 Apr;6(2):133-8.

PMID:1597846
Abstract

A multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled parallel group study comparing various doses of the combination diltiazem SR (DTZ SR)/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) with the monotherapies was performed to delineate the optimal antihypertensive dosage of the two drug combinations. The study was carried out in 298 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (stable supine diastolic blood pressure, DBP, greater than or equal to 95 and less than or equal to 110 mmHg). After a single-blind placebo lead-in period lasting 4-6 weeks to establish stable baseline BP, the patients were randomised to receive either placebo (n = 75), HCTZ (n = 76), DTZ SR (n = 72), or the combination of DTZ SR/HCTZ (n = 75). There were three 4-week evaluation periods with forced escalation of therapy as follows: HCTZ (6.25, 6.25, 12.5 mg twice daily), DTZ SR (60, 90, 120 mg twice daily), and the combination of DTZ SR/HCTZ (60/6.25, 90/6.25, 120/12.5 mg twice daily). DTZ SR/HCTZ (120/12.5 mg) produced statistically significantly greater reductions in supine DBP compared with each monotherapy and placebo. The lower doses of DTZ SR/HCTZ (60/6.25 mg and 90/6.25 mg) produced statistically significantly greater supine DBP reductions compared with DTZ SR monotherapy and placebo, but not compared with HCTZ monotherapy. A comparison of reduction in supine DBP between evaluation periods demonstrated a dose-response relationship for the combination therapy in reducing BP over the dosage range studied. Adverse clinical and laboratory events were not significantly different between the therapies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

开展了一项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照平行组研究,比较不同剂量的缓释地尔硫䓬(DTZ SR)/氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)联合用药与单一疗法,以确定两种药物联合使用的最佳降压剂量。该研究纳入了298例轻度至中度原发性高血压患者(静息舒张压[DBP]稳定,大于或等于95mmHg且小于或等于110mmHg)。经过为期4 - 6周的单盲安慰剂导入期以建立稳定的基线血压后,患者被随机分配接受安慰剂(n = 75)、HCTZ(n = 76)、DTZ SR(n = 72)或DTZ SR/HCTZ联合用药(n = 75)。有三个为期4周的评估期,治疗方案按以下方式强制递增:HCTZ(每日两次,每次6.25、6.25、12.5mg),DTZ SR(每日两次,每次60、90、120mg),以及DTZ SR/HCTZ联合用药(每日两次,每次60/6.25、90/6.25、120/12.5mg)。与每种单一疗法和安慰剂相比,DTZ SR/HCTZ(120/12.5mg)使静息DBP降低具有统计学显著差异。较低剂量的DTZ SR/HCTZ(60/6.25mg和90/6.25mg)与DTZ SR单一疗法和安慰剂相比,使静息DBP降低具有统计学显著差异,但与HCTZ单一疗法相比无显著差异。评估期之间静息DBP降低情况的比较表明,联合治疗在所研究的剂量范围内降低血压存在剂量 - 反应关系。各治疗组之间不良临床和实验室事件无显著差异。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
A dose escalation trial comparing the combination of diltiazem SR and hydrochlorothiazide with the monotherapies in patients with essential hypertension.一项剂量递增试验,比较缓释地尔硫䓬与氢氯噻嗪联合用药和单药治疗原发性高血压患者的疗效。
J Hum Hypertens. 1992 Apr;6(2):133-8.
2
A randomized, controlled trial comparing diltiazem, hydrochlorothiazide, and their combination in the therapy of essential hypertension.一项比较地尔硫䓬、氢氯噻嗪及其联合用药治疗原发性高血压的随机对照试验。
Pharmacotherapy. 1993 Sep-Oct;13(5):487-93.
3
Comparison of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy at doses up to 320/25 mg versus monotherapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study followed by long-term combination therapy in hypertensive adults.缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪剂量高达320/25毫克的联合治疗与单药治疗的比较:一项针对高血压成人的双盲、安慰剂对照研究,随后进行长期联合治疗。
Clin Ther. 2007 Jan;29(1):61-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.01.007.
4
Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (lisinopril) versus a calcium channel antagonist (diltiazem SR) in the treatment of moderate to severe hypertension.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(赖诺普利)与钙通道拮抗剂(缓释地尔硫䓬)治疗中重度高血压的疗效和耐受性比较。
J Hum Hypertens. 1994 Jul;8(7):531-7.
5
The results of a large multicentre study comparing low-dose lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide with the monocomponents.一项比较低剂量赖诺普利-氢氯噻嗪与单一成分药物的大型多中心研究结果。
J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Dec;5 Suppl 2:73-6.
6
Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors: the VAST study.缬沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平单药治疗对伴有其他心血管危险因素的高血压患者的疗效及耐受性比较:VAST研究
Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):578-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.05.006.
7
Diltiazem compared with metoprolol as add-on-therapies to diuretics in hypertension. Swedish Diltiazem-Metoprolol Multicentre Study Group.
J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Apr;5(2):107-14.
8
Perindopril plus nifedipine versus perindopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in mild to severe hypertension: a double-blind multicentre study. The Multicentre Study Group on Treatment Association with Perindopril.培哚普利联合硝苯地平与培哚普利联合氢氯噻嗪治疗轻至重度高血压:一项双盲多中心研究。培哚普利治疗联合多中心研究组。
J Hum Hypertens. 1994 Feb;8(2):145-9.
9
Double-blind, parallel, comparative multicentre study of a new combination of diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide with individual components in patients with mild or moderate hypertension.地尔硫䓬与氢氯噻嗪新组合与各单一成分治疗轻、中度高血压患者的双盲、平行、对照多中心研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 1996 Jul;10(7):443-8.
10
Tolerability and blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the combination of amlodipine plus valsartan compared with lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in adult patients with stage 2 hypertension.氨氯地平联合缬沙坦与赖诺普利联合氢氯噻嗪治疗成年2级高血压患者的耐受性及降压疗效比较
Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of monotherapy with thiazide diuretics for primary hypertension.噻嗪类利尿剂单药治疗原发性高血压的降压疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 29;2014(5):CD003824. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003824.pub2.
2
Meta-analysis of dose-response relationships for hydrochlorothiazide, chlorthalidone, and bendroflumethiazide on blood pressure, serum potassium, and urate.氢氯噻嗪、氯噻酮和苯氟噻嗪对血压、血钾和尿酸的剂量-反应关系的荟萃分析。
Hypertension. 2012 Jun;59(6):1104-9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.190637. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
3
Combination therapy in hypertension.
高血压的联合治疗。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Mar;13(3):146-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00397.x. Epub 2010 Dec 10.
4
Blood pressure lowering efficacy of diuretics as second-line therapy for primary hypertension.利尿剂作为原发性高血压二线治疗的降压疗效
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD007187. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007187.pub2.
5
Anomalies in the dosing of diltiazem.地尔硫䓬给药异常。
Clin Cardiol. 2000 Jan;23(1):18-23. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960230105.
6
ACE inhibitors in elderly patients with hypertension. Special considerations.老年高血压患者使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂。特殊注意事项。
Drugs Aging. 1996 Jan;8(1):29-37. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199608010-00006.
7
Diltiazem. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in older patients.地尔硫䓬。老年患者药理学及治疗应用综述。
Drugs Aging. 1993 Jul-Aug;3(4):363-90. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199303040-00007.