Montaño-Loza Aldo, Meza-Junco Judith, Chan-Nuñez Carlos, Robles-Díaz Guillermo
Departamento de Gastroenterología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán.
Rev Invest Clin. 2005 Jan-Feb;57(1):13-21.
BACKGROUND/AIM: There are theoretic arguments in favor and against biliary drainage before the pancreatoduodenectomy. Most of the studies failed to show any beneficial effect of this approach whereas others even reported an increased postoperative morbidity related with biliary drainage. Therefore, the role of preoperative biliary drainage remains controversial. So, we decided to analyze our own results in a series of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy in order to determine the association between preoperative biliary drainage and postoperative outcome.
We analyzed 109 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy between January 1990 and May 2003. Patients were classified in 3 groups: Group 1 (n = 64) patients without preoperative biliary drainage, Group 2 (n = 27) patients who underwent preoperative biliary drainage with sphincterotomy and stent placement, and Group 3 (n = 18) only sphincterotomy. Demographic characteristics, surgical risk, comorbility, type of surgery, pathology and biochemical parameters were analyzed. We also, stratified patients with and without cholestasis (total bilirubin > 3 mg/dL), and divided patients in two groups: with biliary drainage and without biliary drainage. Surgical and medical complications, the frequency of patients with at least one complication (global morbidity) and mortality were compared between groups. Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, chi2 and Fisher tests were used for the analysis of categorical and dimensional variables.
The most frequent postoperative diagnoses were biliopancreatic tumors. Global postoperative morbidity and mortality were 40% (n = 44) and 10% (n = 11), respectively. The frequency of surgery and medical complications were no significantly different among the 3 groups. However, when only patients with cholestasis were analyzed (n = 65), there was a lower frequency of surgical complications and global postoperative morbidity in patients with preoperative biliary drainage (p = 0.02, OR 0.14, CI 95% 0.04-0.50 and p < 0.001, OR 0.18, CI 95% 0.05-0.65, respectively). There were not significant differences in the frequency of medical complications (p = 0.09) and mortality.
Preoperative biliary drainage should not be considered as a routine procedure in candidates undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy; however, this maneuver decreased approximately seven times the risk of postoperative global morbidity in patients with cholestasis, mainly by reducing surgical complications reduction.
背景/目的:对于在胰十二指肠切除术前行胆汁引流,存在支持和反对的理论依据。大多数研究未能显示出这种方法有任何有益效果,而其他一些研究甚至报告称胆汁引流会增加术后发病率。因此,术前胆汁引流的作用仍存在争议。所以,我们决定分析我们自己在一系列接受胰十二指肠切除术患者中的结果,以确定术前胆汁引流与术后结果之间的关联。
我们分析了1990年1月至2003年5月期间接受胰十二指肠切除术的109例患者。患者分为3组:第1组(n = 64)为未进行术前胆汁引流的患者,第2组(n = 27)为接受了括约肌切开术和支架置入的术前胆汁引流患者,第3组(n = 18)仅进行了括约肌切开术。分析了人口统计学特征、手术风险、合并症、手术类型、病理和生化参数。我们还将有和无胆汁淤积(总胆红素> 3mg/dL)的患者进行分层,并将患者分为两组:有胆汁引流组和无胆汁引流组。比较了各组之间的手术和医疗并发症、至少有一项并发症的患者频率(总体发病率)和死亡率。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、卡方检验和Fisher检验来分析分类变量和计量变量。
最常见的术后诊断为胆胰肿瘤。总体术后发病率和死亡率分别为40%(n = 44)和10%(n = 11)。3组之间手术和医疗并发症的频率无显著差异。然而,仅分析有胆汁淤积的患者(n = 65)时,术前胆汁引流患者的手术并发症频率和总体术后发病率较低(分别为p = 0.02,OR 0.14,95%CI 0.04 - 0.50和p < 0.001,OR 0.18,95%CI 0.05 - 0.65)。医疗并发症频率和死亡率无显著差异(p = 0.09)。
对于接受胰十二指肠切除术的患者,术前胆汁引流不应被视为常规操作;然而,该操作可使胆汁淤积患者的术后总体发病风险降低约7倍,主要是通过减少手术并发症实现的。