Vitacco Michael J, Neumann Craig S, Jackson Rebecca L
Mendota Mental Health Institute, Madison, WI 53704, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Jun;73(3):466-76. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.466.
Although a 2-factor model has advanced research on the psychopathy construct, a 3-factor model was recently developed that emphasized pathological personality and eliminated antisocial behavior. However, dropping antisocial behavior from the psychopathy construct may not be advantageous. Using a large sample of psychiatric patients from the MacArthur Risk Assessment Study (J. Monahan & H. J. Steadman, 1994), the authors used confirmatory factor analysis to test a 4-factor model of psychopathy, which included interpersonal, affective, and behavioral impulsivity dimensions and an antisocial behavior dimension. Model fit was good for this 4-factor model, even when ethnicity, gender, and intelligence variables were included in the model. Structural equation modeling was used to compare the 3- and 4-factor models in predicting proximal (violence) and distal (intelligence) correlates of psychopathy.
尽管双因素模型推动了对精神病态结构的研究,但最近又开发了一种三因素模型,该模型强调病态人格并剔除了反社会行为。然而,从精神病态结构中剔除反社会行为可能并无益处。作者利用麦克阿瑟风险评估研究(J. 莫纳汉和H. J. 斯特德曼,1994年)中的大量精神病患者样本,运用验证性因素分析来检验一种四因素精神病态模型,该模型包括人际、情感和行为冲动维度以及一个反社会行为维度。即使在模型中纳入了种族、性别和智力变量,该四因素模型的拟合度也很好。结构方程建模被用于比较三因素模型和四因素模型在预测精神病态的近端(暴力)和远端(智力)相关因素方面的表现。