Walsh Zach, Kosson David S
Brown University, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2008 Jun;20(2):114-20. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.20.2.114.
The power of scales based on the Psychopathy Checklist (PCL; R. D. Hare, 1980) for prediction of violent behavior is well established. Although evidence suggests that this relationship is chiefly due to the impulsive and antisocial lifestyle component (Factor 2), the predictive power of psychopathy for violence may also reflect the multiplicative effects of this component with interpersonal and unemotional traits (Factor 1). The determination of the extent to which psychopathy subcomponents interact to predict violence has theoretical and practical implications for PCL-assessed psychopathy. However, the relationship between violence and the interactive effects of psychopathy subcomponents remains largely undetermined. The authors used prospective and cross-sectional designs to examine the independent and interactive effects of the factors of PCL-assessed psychopathy in 2 samples: (a) 199 county jail inmates and (b) 863 civil psychiatric patients. The Factor 1 x Factor 2 interaction predicted violence in both samples, such that the predictive power of Factor 2 was attenuated at lower levels of Factor 1.
基于《精神病态核查表》(PCL;R.D. 黑尔,1980年)预测暴力行为的量表的效力已得到充分证实。尽管有证据表明这种关系主要归因于冲动和反社会生活方式成分(因素2),但精神病态对暴力行为的预测力也可能反映了该成分与人际和冷漠特质(因素1)的相乘效应。确定精神病态子成分在预测暴力行为时相互作用的程度,对于经PCL评估的精神病态具有理论和实践意义。然而,暴力行为与精神病态子成分的交互效应之间的关系在很大程度上仍未确定。作者采用前瞻性和横断面设计,在两个样本中检验了经PCL评估的精神病态各因素的独立和交互效应:(a)199名县监狱囚犯和(b)863名民事精神病患者。因素1×因素2的交互作用在两个样本中均能预测暴力行为,即因素2的预测力在因素1较低水平时会减弱。