Antanavicius G, Lamb J, Papasavas P, Caushaj P
Temple University School of Medicine Clinical Campus at the Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15223, USA.
Am Surg. 2005 May;71(5):416-9.
Tube thoracostomy management with suction or water seal after anatomical pulmonary resection remains somewhat controversial. Initial chest tube management may influence the duration of pleural fluid drainage, duration of tube thoracostomy, and/or hospital length of stay following pulmonary resection. We hypothesized that initial chest tube management with water seal decreases time for chest tube removal and decreases time of hospital stay. A retrospective chart review was performed on 109 consecutive patients who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy in Western Pennsylvania Hospital between December 1999 and December 2003. Comparison was made between chest tube management of water seal or suction in patients with and without air leak. Of the 109 patients, 78 (72%) had no air leak at the completion of surgery, and 31 (28%) had air leak. In the group without air leak (n = 78), water seal was used in 32 (41%) patients and suction in 46 (59%). In patients placed to water seal initially after surgery (n = 32), removal of chest tubes was on postoperative day (POD) 3.19 +/- 0.24 and hospital discharge was on POD 5.13 +/- 0.61. In patients placed to suction initially (n = 46), chest tubes were removed on POD 4.52 +/- 0.40. Hospital discharge was on POD 6.74 +/- 0.5. Both duration of chest tube (P < 0.007) and length of hospital stay (P < 0.04) were significantly lower in the water seal group. In the air leak group (n = 31), 7 (23%) patients were managed with water seal and 24 (77%) patients with suction. Both duration of chest tube (P = 0.001) and length of hospital stay (P < 0.05) were significantly lower in the water seal group. In patients without air leak, chest tubes should be managed with water seal following anatomical pulmonary resection, resulting in significantly shorter chest tube duration and hospital length of stay.
解剖性肺切除术后采用吸引或水封法进行胸腔闭式引流管理仍存在一定争议。初始胸管管理可能会影响胸腔积液引流时间、胸腔闭式引流持续时间和/或肺切除术后的住院时间。我们假设,初始采用水封法进行胸管管理可缩短胸管拔除时间并缩短住院时间。对1999年12月至2003年12月期间在宾夕法尼亚西部医院连续接受肺叶切除术或肺段切除术的109例患者进行了回顾性病历审查。对有或无漏气的患者在水封或吸引胸管管理方面进行了比较。109例患者中,78例(72%)术后无漏气,31例(28%)有漏气。在无漏气组(n = 78)中,32例(41%)患者采用水封法,46例(59%)患者采用吸引法。术后最初采用水封法的患者(n = 32),胸管在术后第3.19±0.24天拔除,出院时间为术后第5.13±0.61天。最初采用吸引法的患者(n = 46),胸管在术后第4.52±0.40天拔除。出院时间为术后第6.74±0.5天。水封组的胸管留置时间(P < 0.007)和住院时间(P < 0.04)均显著缩短。在漏气组(n = 31)中,7例(23%)患者采用水封法管理,24例(77%)患者采用吸引法管理。水封组的胸管留置时间(P = 0.001)和住院时间(P < 0.05)均显著缩短。对于无漏气的患者,解剖性肺切除术后应采用水封法管理胸管,这可显著缩短胸管留置时间和住院时间。