• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国农村的市场转型、教育差距与家庭策略:关于性别分层与发展的新证据

Market transition, educational disparities, and family strategies in rural China: new evidence on gender stratification and development.

作者信息

Hannum Emily

机构信息

Department of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania, 3718 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6299, USA.

出版信息

Demography. 2005 May;42(2):275-99. doi: 10.1353/dem.2005.0014.

DOI:10.1353/dem.2005.0014
PMID:15986987
Abstract

Two theoretical perspectives have dominated debates about the impact of development on gender stratification: modernization theory, which argues that gender inequalities decline with economic growth, and the "women in development" perspective, which argues that development may initially widen gender gaps. Analyzing cross-sectional surveys and time-series data from China, this article indicates the relevance of both perspectives: while girls' educational opportunities were clearly more responsive than boys' to better household economic circumstances, the era of market transition in the late 1970s and early 1980s failed to accelerate and, in fact, may have temporarily slowed progress toward gender equity.

摘要

关于发展对性别分层的影响,有两种理论观点主导了相关辩论:现代化理论,该理论认为性别不平等会随着经济增长而减少;以及“妇女参与发展”观点,该观点认为发展最初可能会扩大性别差距。通过分析来自中国的横断面调查和时间序列数据,本文表明这两种观点都有相关性:虽然女孩的教育机会比男孩对家庭经济状况改善的反应更明显,但20世纪70年代末和80年代初的市场转型时期未能加速,事实上,可能暂时减缓了性别平等的进程。

相似文献

1
Market transition, educational disparities, and family strategies in rural China: new evidence on gender stratification and development.中国农村的市场转型、教育差距与家庭策略:关于性别分层与发展的新证据
Demography. 2005 May;42(2):275-99. doi: 10.1353/dem.2005.0014.
2
Have we achieved gender equality?我们实现性别平等了吗?
Curationis. 2006 Aug;29(3):3-4.
3
Women's participation and a new mechanism of population control in the current transformation process in rural China.中国农村当前转型过程中妇女的参与及人口控制新机制。
Chin J Popul Sci. 1994;6(3):243-9.
4
Education and fertility in two Chinese provinces: 1967-1970 to 1979-1982.中国两个省份的教育与生育率:1967 - 1970年至1979 - 1982年
Asia Pac Popul J. 1988 Mar;3(1):3-30.
5
Gender difference in child mortality.儿童死亡率的性别差异。
Egypt Popul Fam Plann Rev. 1990 Dec;24(2):60-79.
6
Women's work and development in Latin America.拉丁美洲女性的工作与发展
Stud Comp Int Dev. 1985 Spring;20(1):3-30. doi: 10.1007/BF02718316.
7
Women's preferences for children in Shifang County, Sichuan, China.中国四川省什邡县女性对子女的偏好。
Asian Pac Popul Forum. 1990 Fall;4(3):1-12, 27-8.
8
Fertility and the family.生育与家庭。
Integration. 1991 Sep(29):42-3.
9
Credit programs, women's empowerment, and contraceptive use in rural Bangladesh.孟加拉国农村的信贷项目、妇女赋权与避孕措施使用情况
Stud Fam Plann. 1994 Mar-Apr;25(2):65-76.
10
[Discussion of the relation of women's position to population control in China].[关于中国妇女地位与人口控制关系的讨论]
Ren Kou Xue Kan. 1991 Feb(1):31-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between family background and self-efficacy in adolescent table tennis players: a moderated mediation model.青少年乒乓球运动员家庭背景与自我效能感的关系:一个有调节的中介模型
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 5;14:1125493. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1125493. eCollection 2023.
2
Association between Urban Educational Policies and Migrant Children's Social Integration in China: Mediated by Psychological Capital.城市教育政策与流动儿童社会融合的关系研究——心理资本的中介作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 9;20(4):3047. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043047.
3
Context-relevant risk and protective factors for children in rural communities: Long-term implications for adulthood educational and mental health outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Family sources of educational gender inequality in rural china: A critical assessment.中国农村教育中性别不平等的家庭根源:一项批判性评估。
Int J Educ Dev. 2009 Sep 1;29(5):474-486. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.04.007.
农村社区儿童的相关风险和保护因素:对成年后教育和心理健康结果的长期影响。
J Community Psychol. 2023 Mar;51(2):724-744. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22909. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
4
Are only-children different? Evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment of the Chinese one-child policy.仅生育一个孩子的家庭有何不同?来自中国一孩政策实地实验的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 8;17(11):e0277210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277210. eCollection 2022.
5
The Positive Effect of Women's Education on Fertility in Low-Fertility China.中国低生育率背景下女性教育对生育的积极影响
Eur J Popul. 2022 Feb 7;38(1):125-161. doi: 10.1007/s10680-021-09603-2. eCollection 2022 Mar.
6
Childhood adversity and healthy ageing: a study of the Chinese older population.童年逆境与健康老龄化:一项针对中国老年人群体的研究。
Eur J Ageing. 2021 Mar 9;18(4):523-535. doi: 10.1007/s10433-021-00608-8. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
Effect pathways of informal family separation on children's outcomes: Paternal labor migration and long-term educational attainment of left-behind children in rural China.非正式家庭分离对儿童结果的影响途径:中国农村地区留守父亲外出务工与留守儿童长期教育获得
Soc Sci Res. 2021 Jul;97:102576. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102576. Epub 2021 May 2.
8
Family Arrangements and Children's Education Among Migrants: A Case Study of China.农民工家庭安排与子女教育:以中国为例的研究
Int J Urban Reg Res. 2020 May;44(3):484-504. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12649. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
9
'Motherhood penalty' and 'fatherhood premium'? Fertility effects on parents in China.“母亲身份惩罚”与“父亲身份红利”?生育对中国父母的影响。
Demogr Res. 2016;35:1373-1410. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.47. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
10
Cross-national comparison of gender differences in the enrollment in and completion of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics Massive Open Online Courses.跨国比较科学、技术、工程和数学大规模在线开放课程入学和完成方面的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0202463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202463. eCollection 2018.