Parrado Emilio A, Flippen Chenoa A, McQuiston Chris
Department of Sociology, Duke University, Box 90088, Durham, NC 27708-0088, USA.
Demography. 2005 May;42(2):347-72. doi: 10.1353/dem.2005.0016.
Our study drew on original data collected in Durham, NC, and four sending communities in Mexico to examine differences in women's relationship power that are associated with migration and residence in the United States. We analyzed the personal, relationship, and social resources that condition the association between migration and women's power and the usefulness of the Relationship Control Scale (RCS) for capturing these effects. We found support for perspectives that emphasize that migration may simultaneously mitigate and reinforce gender inequities. Relative to their nonmigrant peers, Mexican women in the United States average higher emotional consonance with their partners, but lower relationship control and sexual negotiation power. Methodologically, we found that the RCS is internally valid and useful for measuring the impact of resources on women's power. However, the scale appears to combine diverse dimensions of relationship power that were differentially related to migration in our study.
我们的研究借鉴了在北卡罗来纳州达勒姆以及墨西哥四个移民输出社区收集的原始数据,以考察与移民及在美国居住相关的女性关系权力差异。我们分析了影响移民与女性权力之间关联的个人、关系及社会资源,以及关系控制量表(RCS)在捕捉这些影响方面的效用。我们发现,有观点认为移民可能同时减轻和加剧性别不平等,这一观点得到了支持。相对于非移民同龄人,在美国的墨西哥女性与伴侣的情感共鸣平均较高,但关系控制权和性协商权较低。在方法论上,我们发现RCS在内部是有效的,且有助于衡量资源对女性权力的影响。然而,该量表似乎将关系权力的不同维度结合在一起,而在我们的研究中,这些维度与移民的关联各不相同。