Suppr超能文献

保乳治疗后同侧乳腺肿瘤复发:单机构象限切除术与肿块切除术的比较。

Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving therapy: A comparison of quadrantectomy versus lumpectomy at a single institution.

作者信息

Noh Woo Chul, Paik Nam Sun, Kim Min Suk, Yang Kwang Mo, Cho Chul Koo, Choi Dong Wook, Lee Jong Inn, Kang Sung Ku, Kim Sang Bum, Moon Nan Mo

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, 215-4, Gongneung-dong, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 139-706, Korea.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2005 Aug;29(8):1001-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7928-4.

Abstract

The aims of study were to compare the rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), for patients treated with either quadrantectomy or lumpectomy at a single institution, and to identify predictors of IBTR after breast-conserving therapy (BCT). The database and medical records of 807 patients who underwent BCT for breast cancer between 1987 and 2002 were reviewed. The age of the patient, tumor size, lymph node status, extensive intraductal component (EIC), re-excision, final margin status, and the extent of surgery were examined in reference to IBTR rates. Of the total 807 patients, 456 (56.5%) had undergone quadrantectomy and 351 patients (43.5%) had lumpectomy. Apart from the higher re-excision rate in the lumpectomy group (p < 0.001), there were no significant differences in clinical and pathologic characteristics between the patients in the two groups. At the median follow-up time of 72 months, 28 cases of IBTR (3.4%) and 56 cases of systemic recurrence (6.9%) had developed in 72 patients (8.9%). On multivariate analysis, young age (< or =35) (p = 0.041), positive lymph node (p < 0.001), and the presence of EIC (p = 0.004) were independent predictors of IBTR. However, we could not find a significant difference in IBTR rate between the two groups (p = 0.546). Thus, the extent of breast surgery (quadrantectomy or lumpectomy) did not make a significant difference in IBTR if adequate surgical margins could be achieved.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较在同一机构接受象限切除术或肿块切除术的患者同侧乳腺肿瘤复发(IBTR)率,并确定保乳治疗(BCT)后IBTR的预测因素。回顾了1987年至2002年间807例接受BCT治疗乳腺癌患者的数据库和病历。参照IBTR率,对患者年龄、肿瘤大小、淋巴结状态、广泛导管内成分(EIC)、再次切除、切缘最终状态及手术范围进行了检查。在总共807例患者中,456例(56.5%)接受了象限切除术,351例(43.5%)接受了肿块切除术。除肿块切除术组再次切除率较高外(p<0.001),两组患者的临床和病理特征无显著差异。在中位随访时间72个月时,72例患者(8.9%)出现28例IBTR(3.4%)和56例全身复发(6.9%)。多因素分析显示,年轻(≤35岁)(p=0.041)、淋巴结阳性(p<0.001)和存在EIC(p=0.004)是IBTR的独立预测因素。然而,我们未发现两组间IBTR率有显著差异(p=0.546)。因此,如果能获得足够的手术切缘,乳腺手术范围(象限切除术或肿块切除术)对IBTR并无显著影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验