• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Randomized controlled study of a retiree health promotion program. The Bank of American Study.

作者信息

Leigh J P, Richardson N, Beck R, Kerr C, Harrington H, Parcell C L, Fries J F

机构信息

Department of Economics, San Jose State University, CA 95192-0114.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1992 Jun;152(6):1201-6.

PMID:1599348
Abstract

The initial results of a 12-month controlled trial of a health promotion program in 5686 Bank of America retirees, randomized into full program, questionnaire only, and insurance claims only groups, were analyzed to determine whether the health promotion program was effective. Comparisons were between program and questionnaire only groups for self-reported health habit changes, health risk scores, medical care utilization, and days confined to home, and between all groups for insurance claims data. The intervention, or full program, included health habit questionnaires administered every 6 months, individualized time-oriented health risk appraisals, personal recommendation letters, self-management materials, and a health promotion book. Twelve-month changes in health habits, health status, and economic variables favored the full program group in 31 of 32 comparisons and were statistically significant at the .05 level in two-tailed tests in 19 comparisons and at the .01 level in two-tailed tests in 13 comparisons. Over 12 months, overall computed health risk scores decreased by 4.3% in the full program experimental group and increased by 7.2% in the questionnaire only control group. Total direct and indirect costs decreased by 11% in the experimental group and increased by 6.3% in the questionnaire only control group. Analysis of claims data confirmed these trends. A low-cost health promotion program for retirees was effective in changing health behaviors and has potential to decrease health care utilization.

摘要

相似文献

1
Randomized controlled study of a retiree health promotion program. The Bank of American Study.
Arch Intern Med. 1992 Jun;152(6):1201-6.
2
Two-year results of a randomized controlled trial of a health promotion program in a retiree population: the Bank of America Study.
Am J Med. 1993 May;94(5):455-462. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90078-4.
3
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a structured breast-feeding promotion program integrated into a Maternal and Child Health service in Jerusalem.对耶路撒冷母婴健康服务中纳入的结构化母乳喂养促进项目的效果评估。
Isr J Med Sci. 1988 Jul;24(7):342-8.
4
Evaluation of the effect of group counselling on post myocardial infarction patients: determined by an analysis of quality of life.团体咨询对心肌梗死后患者的效果评估:通过生活质量分析确定
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Feb;16(2):402-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01498.x.
5
Cost and utilization analysis of a pediatric emergency department diversion project.儿科急诊科分流项目的成本与利用情况分析
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):1075-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2093.
6
Patient education in arthritis: randomized controlled trial of a mail-delivered program.关节炎患者教育:一项邮寄式项目的随机对照试验
J Rheumatol. 1997 Jul;24(7):1378-83.
7
Effects of lifestyle intervention on health care costs: Improving Control with Activity and Nutrition (ICAN).生活方式干预对医疗保健成本的影响:通过活动与营养改善控制(ICAN)。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Aug;107(8):1365-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.05.015.
8
Impact of worksite wellness intervention on cardiac risk factors and one-year health care costs.工作场所健康干预对心脏危险因素及一年医疗保健费用的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Nov 15;104(10):1389-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.07.007. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
9
The impact of 'comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)' implementation on the effectiveness and cost (CEA) of healthcare in an acute geriatric ward.“综合老年评估(CGA)”的实施对急性老年病房医疗保健的有效性和成本(成本效益分析)的影响。
Acta Med Indones. 2008 Jan;40(1):3-10.
10
Diabetes disease management in a community-based setting.社区环境下的糖尿病疾病管理。
Manag Care. 2002 Jun;11(6):42, 45-50.

引用本文的文献

1
Health and Wealth: The Importance for Lifestyle Medicine.健康与财富:对生活方式医学的重要性。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2021 Apr 3;15(4):407-412. doi: 10.1177/15598276211005348. eCollection 2021 Jul-Aug.
2
Effect of a Workplace Wellness Program on Employee Health and Economic Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.工作场所健康计划对员工健康和经济结果的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Apr 16;321(15):1491-1501. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3307.
3
Workplace wellness program and short-term changes in health care expenditures.职场健康计划与医疗保健支出的短期变化
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Dec 30;13:175-178. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.12.019. eCollection 2019 Mar.
4
Effect of health risk assessment and counselling on health behaviour and survival in older people: a pragmatic randomised trial.健康风险评估与咨询对老年人健康行为及生存的影响:一项实用随机试验
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 19;12(10):e1001889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001889. eCollection 2015 Oct.
5
A randomized controlled pilot trial of the functional assessment screening tablet to engage patients at the point of care.一项关于功能评估筛查平板电脑在医疗现场吸引患者参与的随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec;29(12):1641-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2984-9. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
6
Citation searching: a systematic review case study of multiple risk behaviour interventions.引文检索:多风险行为干预的系统评价案例研究
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Jun 3;14:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-73.
7
Cost-effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity: a modelling study.促进身体活动干预措施的成本效益:一项建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 14;6(7):e1000110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000110.
8
Can health promotion programs save Medicare money?健康促进项目能节省医疗保险费用吗?
Clin Interv Aging. 2007;2(1):117-22. doi: 10.2147/ciia.2007.2.1.117.
9
The PRO-AGE study: an international randomised controlled study of health risk appraisal for older persons based in general practice.PRO-AGE研究:一项基于全科医疗的老年人健康风险评估国际随机对照研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Jan 11;7:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-2.
10
Preventive mental health and substance abuse programs and services in managed care.管理式医疗中的预防性心理健康与药物滥用项目及服务
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2002 Aug;29(3):233-58. doi: 10.1007/BF02287366.