Koyuncuoglu Hasan Rifat, Kutluhan Suleyman, Yesildag Ahmet, Oyar Orhan, Guler Kezban, Ozden Ahmet
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.
Eur J Radiol. 2005 Dec;56(3):365-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.05.013. Epub 2005 Jul 1.
The diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is mainly based on clinical findings and electrodiagnostic tests (EDT). However, EDT results do not support clinical findings in some cases. It has been recently suggested that ultrasonography (US) can be used to diagnose CTS. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether US has a diagnostic value for CTS in patients with negative EDT findings or not. EDT was performed on 319 wrists with clinical CTS findings in electrophysiology laboratory. Median and ulnar nerve conduction velocities were measured in all cases and electromyography was performed in patient with tenar atrophy and having suspicion involvement of brachial plexus as EDT. Fifty-nine wrists with negative EDT (study group) and 30 wrists from 15 healthy individuals (control group) were examined using US. The mean of cross-sectional areas (CSAs) measurements were found 8.83+/-3.05 mm2 by tracing method (TM) and 8.51+/-3.13 mm2 by ellipsoid formula (EF) in study group, and 7.63+/-1.52 mm2 by TM and 7.66+/-1.42 mm2 by EF in control group. The differences between study group and control group according to both TM and EF were significant (t-test p=0.0079, p=0.0460, respectively). In study group, CSAs were larger than 10.5 mm2 in 18 (30.51%) and 16 (27.12%) wrists according to TM and EF findings, respectively, and in only one wrist (3.33%) in control group by both TM and EF. The differences of ultrasonographic CTS numbers between study group and control group were significant (p=0.0024 by TM, p=0.0086 by EF). We confirmed the usefulness of quantitative US assessment in the diagnosis of CTS in the patients with negative EDT findings. If EDT findings are inadequate to confirm the CTS in the patients with clinical CTS, US studies may be helpful to diagnose.
腕管综合征(CTS)的诊断主要基于临床表现和电诊断测试(EDT)。然而,在某些情况下,EDT结果并不支持临床表现。最近有人提出,超声检查(US)可用于诊断CTS。在本研究中,我们旨在调查US对EDT结果为阴性的患者诊断CTS是否具有诊断价值。在电生理实验室对319例有临床CTS表现的手腕进行了EDT。所有病例均测量了正中神经和尺神经传导速度,对有鱼际肌萎缩且怀疑臂丛神经受累的患者进行了肌电图检查作为EDT。对59例EDT结果为阴性的手腕(研究组)和15名健康个体的30例手腕(对照组)进行了US检查。研究组通过追踪法(TM)测量的横截面积(CSA)平均值为8.83±3.05mm²,通过椭圆公式(EF)测量为8.51±3.13mm²;对照组通过TM测量为7.63±1.52mm²,通过EF测量为7.66±1.42mm²。根据TM和EF,研究组与对照组之间的差异均具有统计学意义(t检验,p分别为0.0079和0.0460)。在研究组中,根据TM和EF结果,分别有18例(30.51%)和16例(27.12%)手腕的CSA大于10.5mm²,而对照组仅1例手腕(3.33%)通过TM和EF均大于10.5mm²。研究组与对照组超声诊断CTS的数量差异具有统计学意义(TM法p = 0.0024,EF法p = 0.0086)。我们证实了定量US评估对EDT结果为阴性的患者诊断CTS的有用性。如果EDT结果不足以确诊临床有CTS表现的患者的CTS,US检查可能有助于诊断。