Kupka Ralph W, Luckenbaugh David A, Post Robert M, Suppes Trisha, Altshuler Lori L, Keck Paul E, Frye Mark A, Denicoff Kirk D, Grunze Heinz, Leverich Gabriele S, McElroy Susan L, Walden Jörg, Nolen Willem A
Altrecht Institute for Mental Health Care, Tolsteegsingel 2A, 3582 AC Utrecht, Netherlands.
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Jul;162(7):1273-80. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.7.1273.
To detect risk factors for rapid cycling in bipolar disorder, the authors compared characteristics of rapid-cycling and non-rapid-cycling patients both from a categorical and a dimensional perspective.
Outpatients with bipolar I disorder (N=419), bipolar II disorder (N=104), and bipolar disorder not otherwise specified (N=16) were prospectively evaluated with daily mood ratings for 1 year. Subjects were classified as having rapid cycling (defined by the DSM-IV criterion of four or more manic or depressive episodes within 1 year) or not having rapid cycling, and the two groups' demographic and retrospective and prospective illness characteristics were compared. Associated factors were also evaluated in relationship to episode frequency.
Patients with rapid cycling (N=206; 38.2%) significantly differed from those without rapid cycling (N=333) with respect to the following independent variables: history of childhood physical and/or sexual abuse, bipolar I disorder subtype, number of lifetime manic or depressive episodes, history of rapid cycling, and history of drug abuse. The prevalence of these characteristics increased progressively with episode frequency. The proportion of women was greater than the proportion of men only among patients with eight or more episodes per year. The average time spent manic/hypomanic increased as a function of episode frequency, but the average time spent depressed was comparable in patients with one episode and in those with more than one episode. Brief episodes were as frequent as full-duration DSM-IV-defined episodes.
A number of heterogeneous risk factors were progressively associated with increasing episode frequency. Depression predominated in all bipolar disorder patients, but patients with rapid cycling were more likely to be characterized by manic features. The findings overall suggest that rapid cycling is a dimensional course specifier arbitrarily defined on a continuum of episode frequency.
为了检测双相情感障碍快速循环发作的危险因素,作者从分类和维度两个角度比较了快速循环发作患者与非快速循环发作患者的特征。
对419例I型双相情感障碍门诊患者、104例II型双相情感障碍门诊患者以及16例未另行规定的双相情感障碍门诊患者进行了为期1年的前瞻性评估,每日记录情绪评分。将受试者分为快速循环发作组(根据DSM-IV标准定义为1年内有四次或更多次躁狂或抑郁发作)和非快速循环发作组,并比较两组的人口统计学特征以及回顾性和前瞻性疾病特征。还根据发作频率评估了相关因素。
快速循环发作患者(N = 206;38.2%)与非快速循环发作患者(N = 333)在以下独立变量方面存在显著差异:童年期身体和/或性虐待史、I型双相情感障碍亚型、终生躁狂或抑郁发作次数、快速循环发作史以及药物滥用史。这些特征的患病率随着发作频率的增加而逐渐升高。仅在每年发作八次或更多次的患者中,女性比例高于男性比例。躁狂/轻躁狂发作的平均时长随发作频率增加而增加,但抑郁发作的平均时长在发作一次的患者和发作不止一次的患者中相当。短暂发作与DSM-IV定义的全程发作频率相同。
许多异质性危险因素与发作频率增加逐渐相关。在所有双相情感障碍患者中抑郁占主导,但快速循环发作患者更可能以躁狂特征为特点。总体研究结果表明,快速循环发作是在发作频率连续体上任意定义的一个维度性病程说明符。