Schneck Christopher D, Miklowitz David J, Calabrese Joseph R, Allen Michael H, Thomas Marshall R, Wisniewski Stephen R, Miyahara Sachiko, Shelton Melvin D, Ketter Terence A, Goldberg Joseph F, Bowden Charles L, Sachs Gary S
Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4455 East 12th Ave., Box A011-15, Denver, CO 80220, USA.
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;161(10):1902-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.161.10.1902.
This study compared demographic and phenomenological variables between bipolar patients with and without rapid cycling as a function of bipolar I versus bipolar II status.
The authors examined demographic, historical, and symptomatic features of patients with and without rapid cycling in a cross-sectional study of the first 500 patients with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder enrolled in the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder, a multicenter project funded by the National Institute of Mental Health designed to evaluate the longitudinal outcome of patients with bipolar disorder.
Rapid-cycling bipolar disorder occurred in 20% of the study group. Rapid-cycling patients were more likely to be women, although the effect was somewhat more pronounced among bipolar I patients than bipolar II patients. In addition, rapid-cycling bipolar patients experienced onset of their illness at a younger age, were more often depressed at study entry, and had poorer global functioning in the year before study entry than nonrapid-cycling patients. Rapid-cycling patients also experienced a significantly greater number of depressive and hypomanic/manic episodes in the prior year. A lifetime history of psychosis did not distinguish between rapid and nonrapid-cycling patients, although bipolar I patients were more likely to have experienced psychosis than bipolar II patients.
Patients with rapid-cycling bipolar disorder demonstrate a greater severity of illness than nonrapid-cycling patients on a number of clinical measures. This study highlights the need to refine treatments for rapid cycling to reduce the overall morbidity and mortality of patients with this illness course modifier.
本研究比较了伴有和不伴有快速循环的双相情感障碍患者在人口统计学和现象学变量方面的差异,这些差异取决于双相I型与双相II型的状态。
作者在一项横断面研究中,对参与双相情感障碍系统治疗强化项目的首批500例双相I型或双相II型障碍患者进行了检查,这些患者的人口统计学、病史和症状特征被纳入研究。该项目是由美国国立精神卫生研究所资助的多中心项目,旨在评估双相情感障碍患者的纵向转归。
研究组中20%的患者患有快速循环型双相情感障碍。快速循环型患者更可能为女性,尽管这种影响在双相I型患者中比双相II型患者中更为明显。此外,快速循环型双相情感障碍患者发病年龄较轻,在研究入组时更常处于抑郁状态,并且在研究入组前一年的整体功能比非快速循环型患者更差。快速循环型患者在前一年经历的抑郁和轻躁狂/躁狂发作次数也明显更多。尽管双相I型患者比双相II型患者更可能有精神病病史,但有或无精神病病史并不能区分快速循环型和非快速循环型患者。
在多项临床指标上,快速循环型双相情感障碍患者比非快速循环型患者的病情更严重。本研究强调了优化快速循环型双相情感障碍治疗方法的必要性,以降低具有这种病程修饰因素的患者的总体发病率和死亡率。