Lanting Caren I, van Tijn David A, Loeber J Gerard, Vulsma Thomas, de Vijlder Jan J M, Verkerk Paul H
Department of Social Pediatrics and Child and Youth Health Care, Netherlands Organization of Applied Scientific Research Prevention and Health, PO Box 2215, 2301 CE Leiden, Netherlands.
Pediatrics. 2005 Jul;116(1):168-73. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2162.
Since the introduction of screening for congenital hypothyroidism (CH) in 1974, the optimal laboratory strategy has been the subject of debate.
To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of various types of thyroxine (T(4))-based strategies to screen for CH.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In the Netherlands, since January 1, 1995, a primary T(4) determination with supplemental thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and T(4)-binding globulin (TBG) measurements has been used. Results were calculated from cumulative findings for 1181079 children screened between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2000.
Rates of detection of patients with CH of thyroidal origin (CH-T) or CH of central origin (CH-C), false-positive rates, laboratory costs, and costs of initial diagnostic evaluations.
All known infants (n = 393) with CH-T and 92% (n = 66) of infants with CH-C were detected on the basis of low T(4) levels, TSH elevation, and/or low T(4)/TBG ratios. If the decision to refer had been based solely on TSH elevation, then 94% of patients with CH-T and none of the patients with CH-C would have been detected. If low T(4) levels (<or=-3.0 SD) and TSH elevation had been used as the criteria for referral, then the rates of detection would have been 96% for CH-T and 31% for CH-C. The false-positive rates for the 3 approaches were 0.5, 3.3, and 4.7 cases per case detected, respectively. The introduction of the T(4)/TBG ratio into a program using a primary T(4) with supplemental TSH approach generates an extra cost of 11206 dollars per additional case detected. The average costs to detect 1 patient are comparable for the 3 approaches. In addition, our data revealed a substantially greater prevalence of CH-C than reported previously (1 case per 16404 children, compared with earlier estimates of 1 case per 26000 infants to 1 case per 29000 infants).
The T(4) plus TSH plus TBG approach is a recommendable strategy for neonatal CH screening. It offers outstanding detection of patients with CH-C, in addition to those with CH-T, with acceptable costs.
自1974年引入先天性甲状腺功能减退症(CH)筛查以来,最佳实验室策略一直是争论的焦点。
评估各种基于甲状腺素(T4)的策略筛查CH的临床有效性和成本效益。
设计、地点和参与者:在荷兰,自1995年1月1日起,采用先测定T4并辅以甲状腺刺激激素(TSH)和甲状腺素结合球蛋白(TBG)测量的方法。结果根据1995年1月1日至2000年12月31日期间筛查的1181079名儿童的累积数据计算得出。
甲状腺源性CH(CH-T)或中枢性CH(CH-C)患者的检出率、假阳性率、实验室成本以及初始诊断评估成本。
所有已知的CH-T患儿(n = 393)以及92%(n = 66)的CH-C患儿是基于低T4水平、TSH升高和/或低T4/TBG比值被检测出的。如果转诊决策仅基于TSH升高,那么94%的CH-T患儿能够被检测出,而CH-C患儿无一能被检测出。如果将低T4水平(≤-3.0标准差)和TSH升高作为转诊标准,那么CH-T患儿的检出率为96%,CH-C患儿的检出率为31%。这三种方法的假阳性率分别为每例检出病例0.5例、3.3例和4.7例。在采用先测定T4并辅以TSH的方案中引入T4/TBG比值,每多检出一例病例会产生额外成本11206美元。三种方法检测出1例患者的平均成本相当。此外,我们的数据显示CH-C的患病率比之前报道的要高得多(每16404名儿童中有1例,而早期估计为每26000名婴儿中有1例至每29000名婴儿中有1例)。
T4加TSH加TBG的方法是新生儿CH筛查的推荐策略。除了CH-T患者外,它能出色地检测出CH-C患者,且成本可接受。