Suppr超能文献

内皮细胞异质性与获得性免疫缺陷综合征:血管疾病发病机制的范例

Endothelial heterogeneity and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: a paradigm for the pathogenesis of vascular disorders.

作者信息

Goerdt S, Sorg C

机构信息

Institut für Experimentelle Dermatologie, Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster.

出版信息

Clin Investig. 1992 Feb;70(2):89-98. doi: 10.1007/BF00227347.

Abstract

Vascular disorders comprise a wide range of diverse disease entities. Correspondingly, vessels, and even more so the endothelial which line them, show a remarkable extent of heterogeneous differentiation, e.g. between the blood vascular and lymphatic systems, along the length of the vascular trees, and in the microvascular beds of various organs. The most important morphologic criterion to discriminate between endothelia is continuity (continuous endothelial cell layer and well-formed basement membrane) versus discontinuity (intra- or intercellular gaps and/or reduced or missing basement membrane). Most blood vascular endothelia are of the continuous type, while most sinusoidal and lymphatic endothelia are discontinuous by these criteria. Antigen expression corroborates these morphologic data in that CD31, CD34, and 1F10 antigen are exclusively expressed in continuous endothelia, while MS-1 antigen is preferentially expressed in non-continuous sinusoidal endothelia. In contrast, no specific marker has as yet been described for lymphatic endothelia. Endothelial heterogeneity substantially contributes to the pathogenesis of vascular disorders. For example, in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome the same infectious agent may cause either bacillary angiomatosis (a lobular capillary proliferation) or peliosis (sinusoidal dilatation, endothelial denudation, and development of blood-filled cysts) depending on whether the affected organs have predominantly continuous endothelia or noncontinuous sinusoidal endothelia. Moreover, in Kaposi's sarcoma, it is still an open question of whether the lesion is derived from blood vascular or lymphatic endothelia (Kaposi's sarcoma cells in situ do not express the von Willebrand factor+, PAL-E+, 1F10+ phenotype of mature, resting blood vascular endothelia). It is also unresolved how endothelia of either type may be differentially induced to dedifferentiate and how they are recruited into the lesion. Clearly, knowledge about endothelial heterogeneity is still too incomplete to identify the actual mechanisms and molecules that govern the pathogenesis of vascular disorders (including still others than those mentioned here such as atherosclerosis, diabetic angiopathy, and rheumatoid arthritis) affecting distinct endothelia. Further efforts in antigenic phenotyping and in cell and molecular biology of heterogeneously differentiated endothelia should be made to improve this state of affairs.

摘要

血管疾病包括多种不同的疾病实体。相应地,血管,尤其是衬于血管内的内皮细胞,表现出显著程度的异质性分化,例如在血管系统和淋巴系统之间、沿血管树的长度以及在各种器官的微血管床中。区分内皮细胞的最重要形态学标准是连续性(连续的内皮细胞层和完整的基底膜)与不连续性(细胞内或细胞间间隙和/或基底膜减少或缺失)。根据这些标准,大多数血管内皮细胞属于连续型,而大多数窦状和淋巴内皮细胞是不连续的。抗原表达证实了这些形态学数据,因为CD31、CD34和1F10抗原仅在连续内皮细胞中表达,而MS-1抗原优先在不连续的窦状内皮细胞中表达。相比之下,尚未描述淋巴内皮细胞的特异性标志物。内皮细胞异质性在很大程度上促成了血管疾病的发病机制。例如,在获得性免疫缺陷综合征患者中,相同的感染因子可能导致杆菌性血管瘤(小叶状毛细血管增生)或紫癜(窦状扩张、内皮剥脱和充满血液的囊肿形成),这取决于受影响器官主要是连续内皮细胞还是不连续的窦状内皮细胞。此外,在卡波西肉瘤中,病变是源自血管内皮细胞还是淋巴内皮细胞仍是一个悬而未决的问题(卡波西肉瘤原位细胞不表达成熟、静止的血管内皮细胞的血管性血友病因子+、PAL-E+、1F10+表型)。两种类型的内皮细胞如何被差异诱导去分化以及它们如何被募集到病变中也尚未解决。显然,关于内皮细胞异质性的知识仍然过于不完整;无法确定控制影响不同内皮细胞的血管疾病(包括此处未提及的其他疾病,如动脉粥样硬化、糖尿病性血管病和类风湿性关节炎)发病机制的实际机制和分子。应在抗原表型分析以及异质性分化内皮细胞的细胞和分子生物学方面做出进一步努力,以改善这种状况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验