Nijs Jo, Roussel Nathalie, Vermeulen Kim, Souvereyns Greet
Division of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Department of Health Sciences, Hogeschool, Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Jul;86(7):1349-55. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.021.
To examine the interobserver reliability, internal consistency, and clinical importance of 3 clinical tests for the assessment of scapular positioning in patients with shoulder pain.
Prospective repeated-measures design.
Private practices for physical therapy and hospital outpatient physical therapy divisions.
Twenty-nine patients with shoulder pain who were diagnosed by a physician as having a shoulder disorder.
Not applicable.
Study participants filled in a visual analog scale for pain and the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire. Next, 2 assessors performed the following tests: measurement of the distance between the posterior border of the acromion and the table, measurement of the distance from the medial scapular border to the fourth thoracic spinous processes, and the lateral scapular slide test.
The interobserver reliability coefficients were greater than .88 (intraclass correlation coefficients) for the measurement of the distance between the posterior border of the acromion and the table, were greater than .50 for the measurement of the distance from the medial scapular border to the fourth thoracic spinous processes, and were greater than .70 for the lateral scapular slide test. The Cronbach alpha coefficient for internal consistency for all tests was .88. No associations between the outcome of the tests and self-reported pain severity or disability were found.
These data provide evidence favoring the interobserver reliability of 2 of 3 tests for the assessment of scapular positioning in patients with shoulder pain. The clinical importance of the tests' outcomes, however, is questionable.
探讨3项临床检查在评估肩痛患者肩胛骨位置时的观察者间可靠性、内部一致性及临床重要性。
前瞻性重复测量设计。
私人理疗诊所和医院门诊理疗科。
29例经医生诊断患有肩部疾病的肩痛患者。
不适用。
研究参与者填写疼痛视觉模拟量表和肩部功能障碍问卷。接下来,2名评估者进行以下检查:测量肩峰后缘与桌面之间的距离、测量肩胛内侧缘至第4胸椎棘突的距离以及肩胛外侧滑动试验。
肩峰后缘与桌面之间距离测量的观察者间可靠性系数大于0.88(组内相关系数),肩胛内侧缘至第4胸椎棘突距离测量的系数大于0.50,肩胛外侧滑动试验的系数大于0.70。所有检查的内部一致性Cronbach α系数为0.88。未发现检查结果与自我报告的疼痛严重程度或功能障碍之间存在关联。
这些数据为支持3项检查中的2项在评估肩痛患者肩胛骨位置时的观察者间可靠性提供了证据。然而,这些检查结果的临床重要性值得怀疑。