Alizadehkhaiyat Omid, Roebuck Margaret M, Makki Ahmed T, Frostick Simon P
School of Health Sciences (Sport and Exercise Science), Liverpool Hope University, Liverpool, UK.
Musculoskeletal Science Research Group, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Dec;12(7):1111-1120. doi: 10.26603/ijspt20171111.
An aberrant upper body posture has been proposed as one of the etiological factors contributing to the development of subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS). Clinicians have translated this supposition into assessment and rehabilitation programs despite insufficient and conflicting evidence to support this approach.
The purpose of this study was to compare several postural variables between the SAIS patients and asymptomatic healthy controls.
Case-Control Study.
A total of 75 participants including 39 patients (20 females; 19 males) and 36 healthy controls (15 females; 21 males) participated in the study. Study evaluated several postural variables including forward head posture (FHP), forward shoulder posture (FSP), thoracic kyphosis index (TKI), scapular index (SI), normalized scapular protraction (NSP), and the lateral scapular slide test (LSST). The variables were compared between patient and control groups according to sex.
Significant differences were observed in the female patients compared to asymptomatic controls for the FHP (49.38 + 9.6o vs 55.5o+8.38, p=0.03), FSP (45.58 + 10.1o vs 53.68 + 7.08, p=0.02), and LSST in third position (10.2 + 2.1cm vs 11.5 + 0.7cm, p=0.01). Male patients showed a significant difference only in the FSP compared to controls (61.9o+9.4o vs 49.78 + 9.28, p<0.001).
While inadequate data on the relationship between dysfunctional posture and SAIS has led to broad variations in current rehabilitation strategies, the results of the present study revealed different patterns of postural aberrations in female and male patients with SAIS. This clarifies the need to develop individualized or sex-specific approaches for assessing posture in men and women with SAIS and rehabilitation programs based on the assessment results.
3b.
异常的上身姿势被认为是导致肩峰下撞击综合征(SAIS)发生的病因之一。尽管支持这种方法的证据不足且相互矛盾,但临床医生已将这一假设转化为评估和康复计划。
本研究的目的是比较SAIS患者与无症状健康对照者之间的几个姿势变量。
病例对照研究。
共有75名参与者,包括39名患者(20名女性;19名男性)和36名健康对照者(15名女性;21名男性)参与了该研究。研究评估了几个姿势变量,包括头部前伸姿势(FHP)、肩部前伸姿势(FSP)、胸椎后凸指数(TKI)、肩胛指数(SI)、标准化肩胛前伸(NSP)和外侧肩胛滑动试验(LSST)。根据性别对患者组和对照组之间的变量进行比较。
与无症状对照组相比,女性患者在FHP(49.38°+9.6° vs 55.5°+8.38°,p=0.03)、FSP(45.58°+10.1° vs 53.68°+7.08°,p=0.02)和LSST第三位置(10.2cm+2.1cm vs 11.5cm+0.7cm,p=0.01)方面存在显著差异。男性患者与对照组相比,仅在FSP方面存在显著差异(61.9°+9.4° vs 49.78°+9.28°,p<0.001)。
虽然关于功能失调姿势与SAIS之间关系的数据不足导致当前康复策略存在广泛差异,但本研究结果揭示了SAIS女性和男性患者不同的姿势异常模式。这明确了需要制定个性化或针对性别的方法来评估SAIS男性和女性的姿势,并根据评估结果制定康复计划。
3b。