Schmidt Norman B, Salas Danette, Bernert Rebecca, Schatschneider Chris
Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2005 Sep;43(9):1219-29. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.09.004. Epub 2004 Nov 14.
A diagnostic and statistical manual (DSM)-IV diagnosis of agoraphobia in the context of panic disorder (PD) is based on three nosologically sufficient criteria: (1) avoidance, (2) use of companions, and (3) endurance of situations despite distress. Therefore, an agoraphobia diagnosis can be made across an extremely broad range of cases including when there are no avoidance behaviors (e.g., the patient endures the situation). It was hypothesized that clinicians do not weight these criteria equally and that the DSMs individual, sufficient criteria lead to poor inter-rater reliability. Clinicians (N=48) rated hypothetical patients with symptom profiles emphasizing each of these three criteria. Consistent with expectation, clinicians differentially weighted these criteria. Avoidance was relatively more apt to produce a diagnosis when only one criterion was emphasized in clinical vignettes. Inter-rater reliability was poor in instances when only one sufficient criterion was highlighted. Knowledge concerning DSM criteria resulted in a greater rate of agoraphobia endorsement, but knowledge did not account for the overall pattern of findings.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中关于惊恐障碍(PD)背景下广场恐惧症的诊断基于三个在分类学上充分的标准:(1)回避,(2)使用陪伴者,以及(3)尽管痛苦仍忍受情境。因此,广场恐惧症的诊断可以在极其广泛的病例范围内做出,包括不存在回避行为的情况(例如,患者忍受情境)。据推测,临床医生对这些标准的重视程度并不相同,并且DSM的个体充分标准导致评分者间信度较差。临床医生(N = 48)对具有强调这三个标准中每一个标准的症状特征的假设患者进行评分。与预期一致,临床医生对这些标准的加权不同。当临床病例 vignettes 中仅强调一个标准时,回避相对更易于导致诊断。当仅突出一个充分标准时,评分者间信度较差。关于 DSM 标准的知识导致广场恐惧症认可率更高,但知识并不能解释整体研究结果模式。