Suppr超能文献

广场恐惧症:对诊断分类地位和标准的回顾。

Agoraphobia: a review of the diagnostic classificatory position and criteria.

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universitaet Dresden, D-01187Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 2010 Feb;27(2):113-33. doi: 10.1002/da.20646.

Abstract

The status of agoraphobia (AG) as an independent diagnostic category is reviewed and preliminary options and recommendations for the fifth edition of The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-V) are presented. The review concentrates on epidemiology, psychopathology, neurobiology, vulnerability and risk factors, clinical course and outcome, and correlates and consequences of AG since 1990. Differences and similarities across conventions and criteria of DSM and ICD-10 are considered. Three core questions are addressed. First, what is the evidence for AG as a diagnosis independent of panic disorder? Second, should AG be conceptualized as a subordinate form of panic disorder (PD) as currently stipulated in DSM-IV-TR? Third, is there evidence for modifying or changing the current diagnostic criteria? We come to the conclusion that AG should be conceptualized as an independent disorder with more specific criteria rather than a subordinate, residual form of PD as currently stipulated in DSM-IV-TR. Among other issues, this conclusion was based on psychometric evaluations of the construct, epidemiological investigations which show that AG can exist independently of panic disorder, and the impact of agoraphobic avoidance upon clinical course and outcome. However, evidence from basic and clinic validation studies remains incomplete and partly contradictory. The apparent advantages of a more straightforward, simpler classification without implicit hierarchies and insufficiently supported differential diagnostic considerations, plus the option for improved further research, led to favoring the separate diagnostic criteria for AG as a diagnosis independent of panic disorder.

摘要

广场恐惧症(AG)作为一个独立诊断类别的现状进行了回顾,并提出了第五版《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM-V)的初步选择和建议。本次回顾主要集中在 1990 年以来 AG 的流行病学、精神病理学、神经生物学、易感性和风险因素、临床病程和结局以及相关性和后果。考虑了 DSM 和 ICD-10 的分类和标准之间的差异和相似之处。提出了三个核心问题。首先,AG 作为一种独立于惊恐障碍的诊断,其证据是什么?其次,AG 是否应该被概念化为 DSM-IV-TR 目前规定的惊恐障碍的从属形式?第三,是否有证据修改或更改当前的诊断标准?我们的结论是,AG 应该被概念化为一种具有更具体标准的独立障碍,而不是 DSM-IV-TR 目前规定的 PD 的从属、残留形式。除其他问题外,这一结论是基于对该结构的心理测量评估、表明 AG 可以独立于惊恐障碍存在的流行病学调查,以及广场恐惧症回避对临床病程和结局的影响。然而,来自基础和临床验证研究的证据仍然不完整,部分相互矛盾。一个更直接、更简单的分类,没有隐含的层次结构和支持不足的鉴别诊断考虑,加上进一步研究的选择,具有明显的优势,因此赞成将 AG 的独立诊断标准与惊恐障碍分开。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验