Suppr超能文献

盐酸维拉帕米缓释微丸填充胶囊打开后撒在食物上服用与完整吞服时的生物等效性。

Bioequivalence of verapamil hydrochloride extended-release pellet-filled capsules when opened and sprinkled on food and when swallowed intact.

作者信息

Kozloski G D, De Vito J M, Johnson J B, Holmes G B, Adams M A, Hunt T L

机构信息

Scientific Services, Lederle Laboratories, Pearl River, NY.

出版信息

Clin Pharm. 1992 Jun;11(6):539-42.

PMID:1600686
Abstract

A study was performed to determine whether verapamil hydrochloride administered in extended-release pellet-filled capsules is bioequivalent to the same formulation administered by sprinkling the contents of the capsules onto food. Thirty-two healthy subjects participated in the randomized, two-way crossover study. In treatment A, the subjects swallowed the contents of a verapamil hydrochloride extended-release pellet-filled capsule, 240 mg, that had been sprinkled on applesauce. In treatment B, the subjects swallowed the same type of capsule intact. Blood samples were drawn at baseline, every hour for 10 hours, and at 12, 15, 24, 30, 36, and 48 hours after each dose administration. The plasma was analyzed for verapamil and norverapamil by high-performance liquid chromatography. The following calculations were performed: AUC0-48, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, tmax, and k. Results for the two treatments were compared by analysis of variance. There were no significant differences between the AUC0-48, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, tmax, and k for the two methods of dose administration. For verapamil the differences for all variables were less than 5%, and for norverapamil the differences were less than 4% for all variables except tmax (9.5%). The 90% confidence intervals were within acceptable limits for all variables except the norverapamil tmax comparison. Sprinkling the contents of extended-release pellet-filled capsules onto food provides verapamil hydrochloride that is bioequivalent to that obtained from the intact capsules.

摘要

进行了一项研究,以确定填充有缓释微丸的胶囊剂中给予的盐酸维拉帕米与将胶囊内容物撒在食物上给药的相同制剂是否生物等效。32名健康受试者参与了这项随机、双向交叉研究。在治疗A中,受试者吞服了撒在苹果酱上的240mg盐酸维拉帕米缓释微丸填充胶囊的内容物。在治疗B中,受试者完整吞服了相同类型的胶囊。在每次给药后的基线、10小时内每小时、以及12、15、24、30、36和48小时采集血样。通过高效液相色谱法分析血浆中的维拉帕米和去甲维拉帕米。进行了以下计算:AUC0-48、AUC0-无穷大、Cmax、tmax和k。通过方差分析比较两种治疗的结果。两种给药方法的AUC0-48、AUC0-无穷大、Cmax、tmax和k之间无显著差异。对于维拉帕米,所有变量的差异均小于5%,对于去甲维拉帕米,除tmax(9.5%)外,所有变量的差异均小于4%。除去甲维拉帕米tmax比较外,所有变量的90%置信区间均在可接受范围内。将填充有缓释微丸的胶囊内容物撒在食物上提供的盐酸维拉帕米与完整胶囊获得的盐酸维拉帕米生物等效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验