Riedlinger Wolfram F J, Kozakewich Harry P W, Vargas Sara O
Department of Pathology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2005 May-Jun;8(3):355-61. doi: 10.1007/s10024-005-3177-7. Epub 2005 Jul 14.
Rhabdomyosarcoma presents special diagnostic problems when it involves the uterine cervix in young children because tumor cells may lack marked atypia and may blend with the normal, immature, condensed, cellular stroma, rendering diagnosis difficult. Myogenic makers are a valuable ancillary technique for establishing a diagnosis of rhabdomyosarcoma. However, desmin positivity has been reported in cervical stromal cells, which can confound diagnosis. To determine whether immunohistochemical markers of skeletal muscle differentiation are helpful in the diagnosis of uterine botryoid rhabdomyosarcoma, we compared the immunohistochemical staining pattern of cervical rhabdomyosarcoma from 3 patients with that of normal uteri from age-matched autopsy controls by using antibodies for desmin, smooth muscle actin, muscle-specific actin, myoD1, myogenin, and WT-1. All tumors demonstrated at least focal immunopositivity for desmin, muscle-specific actin, smooth muscle actin, myoD1, and WT-1, and 1 tumor was also positive for myogenin. Autopsy controls showed only scattered subepithelial stromal immunoreactivity for desmin, muscle-specific actin, smooth muscle actin, and WT-1 and showed cytoplasmic, but not nuclear, immunopositivity for myoD1 and myogenin. Myometrium was diffusely positive for desmin and muscle-specific actin. We conclude that desmin, muscle-specific actin, smooth muscle actin, and WT1 are not specific for discriminating embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma from normal subepithelial cells in the female genital tract of children, although the number of immunopositive cells is consistently larger in rhabdomyosarcoma. Nuclear staining for myoD1 and myogenin appears not to occur in normal tissue, but it may be absent or sparse in embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Our findings indicate that, in this anatomic site, the diagnosis of rhabdomyosarcoma and in particular determination of tumor margins remain very reliant on histomorphology.
横纹肌肉瘤累及幼儿宫颈时会带来特殊的诊断难题,因为肿瘤细胞可能缺乏明显的异型性,且可能与正常、未成熟、致密的细胞性基质融合,导致诊断困难。肌源性标志物是诊断横纹肌肉瘤的一项有价值的辅助技术。然而,有报道称宫颈基质细胞中结蛋白呈阳性,这可能会混淆诊断。为了确定骨骼肌分化的免疫组化标志物是否有助于诊断葡萄状横纹肌肉瘤,我们使用针对结蛋白、平滑肌肌动蛋白、肌特异性肌动蛋白、肌分化抗原1(MyoD1)、肌细胞生成素和威尔姆斯瘤基因1(WT-1)的抗体,比较了3例宫颈横纹肌肉瘤患者与年龄匹配的尸检对照正常子宫的免疫组化染色模式。所有肿瘤至少在局灶性区域对结蛋白、肌特异性肌动蛋白、平滑肌肌动蛋白、MyoD1和WT-1呈免疫阳性,1例肿瘤对肌细胞生成素也呈阳性。尸检对照仅显示散在的上皮下基质对结蛋白、肌特异性肌动蛋白、平滑肌肌动蛋白和WT-1呈免疫反应,对MyoD1和肌细胞生成素呈细胞质而非细胞核免疫阳性。子宫肌层对结蛋白和肌特异性肌动蛋白呈弥漫性阳性。我们得出结论,结蛋白、肌特异性肌动蛋白、平滑肌肌动蛋白和WT1对于区分儿童女性生殖道胚胎性横纹肌肉瘤与正常上皮下细胞并不具有特异性,尽管横纹肌肉瘤中免疫阳性细胞的数量始终较多。正常组织中似乎不会出现MyoD1和肌细胞生成素的细胞核染色,但在胚胎性横纹肌肉瘤中可能不存在或稀少。我们的研究结果表明,在这个解剖部位,横纹肌肉瘤的诊断,尤其是肿瘤边界的确定,仍然非常依赖组织形态学。