Pattison S
Department of Religious and Theological Studies, Cardiff University, Humanities Building, Colum Drive, Cardiff CF10 3EU, UK.
Nurs Ethics. 2001 Jan;8(1):5-18. doi: 10.1177/096973300100800103.
This article provides a theoretical critique from a particular 'ideal type' ethical perspective of professional codes in general and the United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting (UKCC) Code of professional conduct (reprinted on pp. 77-78) in particular. Having outlined a specific 'ideal type' of what ethically informed and aware practice may be, the article examines the extent to which professional codes may be likely to elicit and engender such practice. Because of their terminological inexactitudes and confusions, their arbitrary values and principles, their lack of helpful ethical guidance, and their exclusion of ordinary moral experience, a number of contemporary professional codes in health and social care can be arraigned as ethically inadequate. The UKCC Code of professional conduct embodies many of these flaws, and others besides. Some of its weaknesses in this respect are anatomized before some tentative suggestions are offered for the reform of codes and the engendering of greater ethical awareness among professionals in the light of greater public ethical concerns and values.
本文从一个特定的“理想类型”伦理视角,对一般的专业守则,尤其是英国护理、助产与健康访视中央理事会(UKCC)的职业行为守则(转载于第77 - 78页)进行了理论批判。在概述了道德明智且有道德意识的实践可能是什么样的一种特定“理想类型”之后,本文考察了专业守则在多大程度上可能引发并促成这种实践。由于它们在术语上的不准确和混乱、任意的价值观和原则、缺乏有益的伦理指导以及排除了普通道德经验,健康和社会护理领域的一些当代专业守则在伦理上可被指责为不充分。UKCC职业行为守则体现了许多这些缺陷,还有其他一些缺陷。在根据公众更大的伦理关切和价值观,为守则改革及提高专业人员的伦理意识提出一些初步建议之前,剖析了它在这方面的一些弱点。