Suppr超能文献

从站立姿势向前跌倒时的手腕撞击速度比向后跌倒时要小。

Wrist impact velocities are smaller in forward falls than backward falls from standing.

作者信息

Tan Juay-Seng, Eng Janice J, Robinovitch Stephen N, Warnick Brady

机构信息

Division of Orthopaedic Engineering Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

J Biomech. 2006;39(10):1804-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.016. Epub 2005 Jul 11.

Abstract

The wrist is a common fracture site for both young and older adults. The purpose of this study was to compare wrist kinematics in backward and forward falls with different fall protective responses. We carried out within-subject comparison of impact velocities and maximum velocities during descent of the distal radius among three different fall configurations: (a) backward falls with knees flexed, (b) backward falls with knees extended and (c) forward falls with knees flexed. We also examined the effect of fall configuration on fall durations, elbow flexion, trunk flexion and forearm angles at impact. Forward falls resulted in smaller impact velocities of the distal radius, longer fall duration, longer braking duration, greater elbow flexion and more horizontal landing position of the forearm compared to backward falls. The distal radius impact velocity during forward falls (1.33 m/s) was significantly lower than in backward falls, and among the backward falls the impact velocity of the flexed knee strategy (2.01 m/s) was significantly lower than the extended knee strategy (2.27 m/s). These impact velocities were significantly reduced from the maximum velocities observed during descent (forward falls=3.57 m/s, backward falls with knee flexed=3.16 m/s, backward falls with knees extended=3.52 m/s). We conclude that (1) smaller impact velocities of the wrists in forward falls could imply a lower fracture risk compared to backward falls, and (2) fall protective responses reduced wrist impact velocities in all fall directions.

摘要

手腕是年轻人和老年人常见的骨折部位。本研究的目的是比较在不同的跌倒防护反应下,向后跌倒和向前跌倒时的手腕运动学。我们对三种不同跌倒姿势下桡骨远端下降过程中的撞击速度和最大速度进行了受试者内比较:(a) 屈膝向后跌倒,(b) 伸膝向后跌倒,(c) 屈膝向前跌倒。我们还研究了跌倒姿势对跌倒持续时间、撞击时的肘部屈曲、躯干屈曲和前臂角度的影响。与向后跌倒相比,向前跌倒导致桡骨远端的撞击速度更小、跌倒持续时间更长、制动持续时间更长、肘部屈曲更大以及前臂着陆位置更水平。向前跌倒时桡骨远端的撞击速度(1.33米/秒)显著低于向后跌倒,在向后跌倒中,屈膝策略的撞击速度(2.01米/秒)显著低于伸膝策略(2.27米/秒)。这些撞击速度与下降过程中观察到的最大速度相比显著降低(向前跌倒 = 3.57米/秒,屈膝向后跌倒 = 3.16米/秒,伸膝向后跌倒 = 3.52米/秒)。我们得出结论:(1) 与向后跌倒相比,向前跌倒时手腕的撞击速度较小可能意味着骨折风险较低;(2) 跌倒防护反应在所有跌倒方向上均降低了手腕的撞击速度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验