• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口服葡萄糖最小模型评估胰岛素敏感性:与钳夹技术的对比验证

Insulin sensitivity by oral glucose minimal models: validation against clamp.

作者信息

Dalla Man Chiara, Yarasheski Kevin E, Caumo Andrea, Robertson Heather, Toffolo Gianna, Polonsky Kenneth S, Cobelli Claudio

机构信息

Dept. of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Via Gradenigo 6/B, I-35131 Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Dec;289(6):E954-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00076.2005. Epub 2005 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1152/ajpendo.00076.2005
PMID:16014353
Abstract

Measuring insulin sensitivity in the presence of physiological changes in glucose and insulin concentrations, e.g., during a meal or OGTT, is important to better understand insulin resistance in a variety of metabolic conditions. Recently, two oral minimal models have been proposed to measure overall insulin sensitivity (S(I)) and its selective effect on glucose disposal (S(I)) from oral tests. S(I) and S(I) have been successfully validated against multiple tracer meal estimates, but validation against euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp estimates is lacking. Here, we do so in 21 subjects who underwent both a multiple-tracer OGTT and a labeled euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. Correlation between minimal-model S(I), S(I) and corresponding clamp estimates S(I)(*clamp), S(I)(*clamp) was satisfactory, respectively r = 0.81, P < 0.001, and r = 0.71, P < 0.001. S(I) was significantly lower than S(I)(clamp) (8.08 +/- 0.89 vs. 13.66 +/- 1.69 10(-4) dl.kg(-1).min(-1) per microU/ml, P = 0.0002), whereas S(I) and S(I)(clamp) were very similar (8.17 +/- 1.59 vs. 8.84 +/- 1.39 10(-4) dl.kg(-1).min(-1) per microU/ml, P = 0.52). These results add credibility to the oral minimal-model method as a simple and reliable physiological tool to estimate S(I) and S(I), also in large-scale clinical trials.

摘要

在葡萄糖和胰岛素浓度发生生理变化时(例如在进餐期间或口服葡萄糖耐量试验期间)测量胰岛素敏感性,对于更好地理解各种代谢状况下的胰岛素抵抗至关重要。最近,有人提出了两种口服简易模型,用于通过口服试验测量总体胰岛素敏感性(S(I))及其对葡萄糖处置的选择性作用(S(I)*)。S(I)和S(I)*已针对多种示踪剂餐估计值成功进行了验证,但缺乏针对正常血糖高胰岛素钳夹估计值的验证。在此,我们对21名同时进行了多示踪剂口服葡萄糖耐量试验和标记的正常血糖高胰岛素钳夹试验的受试者进行了验证。简易模型的S(I)、S(I)与相应钳夹估计值S(I)(*clamp)、S(I)(*clamp)之间的相关性分别令人满意,r = 0.81,P < 0.001,以及r = 0.71,P < 0.001。S(I)显著低于S(I)(clamp)(8.08 +/- 0.89对13.66 +/- 1. .69 10(-4) dl.kg(-1).min(-1) 每微单位/毫升,P = 0.0002),而S(I)和S(I)(*clamp)非常相似(8.17 +/- 1.59对8.84 +/- 1.39 10(-4) dl.kg(-1).min(-1) 每微单位/毫升,P = 0.52)。这些结果为口服简易模型方法作为一种简单可靠的生理工具来估计S(I)和S(I)*增添了可信度,在大规模临床试验中也是如此。

相似文献

1
Insulin sensitivity by oral glucose minimal models: validation against clamp.口服葡萄糖最小模型评估胰岛素敏感性:与钳夹技术的对比验证
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Dec;289(6):E954-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00076.2005. Epub 2005 Jul 12.
2
Modeling hepatic insulin sensitivity during a meal: validation against the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp.模拟进餐时的肝胰岛素敏感性:与正葡萄糖高胰岛素钳夹技术的验证。
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Apr 15;304(8):E819-25. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00482.2012. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
3
The role of endocrine counterregulation for estimating insulin sensitivity from intravenous glucose tolerance tests.内分泌对抗调节在通过静脉葡萄糖耐量试验评估胰岛素敏感性中的作用。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Jun;91(6):2272-8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0019. Epub 2006 Apr 4.
4
A model-based method for assessing insulin sensitivity from the oral glucose tolerance test.一种基于模型的口服葡萄糖耐量试验评估胰岛素敏感性的方法。
Diabetes Care. 2001 Mar;24(3):539-48. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.3.539.
5
Insulin sensitivity assessment in uncomplicated obese women: comparison of indices from fasting and oral glucose load with euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp.单纯性肥胖女性的胰岛素敏感性评估:空腹及口服葡萄糖负荷指标与正常血糖高胰岛素钳夹法的比较
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2004 Dec;14(6):366-72. doi: 10.1016/s0939-4753(04)80027-9.
6
Minimal model estimation of glucose absorption and insulin sensitivity from oral test: validation with a tracer method.通过口服试验对葡萄糖吸收和胰岛素敏感性进行最小模型估计:用示踪法验证
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Oct;287(4):E637-43. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00319.2003. Epub 2004 May 11.
7
Determining pancreatic β-cell compensation for changing insulin sensitivity using an oral glucose tolerance test.使用口服葡萄糖耐量试验确定胰腺β细胞对胰岛素敏感性变化的代偿情况。
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Nov 1;307(9):E822-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00269.2014. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
8
New insulin sensitivity index from the oral glucose tolerance test.口服葡萄糖耐量试验的新胰岛素敏感性指数。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 Jan;79(1):24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2007.05.005. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
9
Hepatic insulin sensitivity in healthy and prediabetic subjects: from a dual- to a single-tracer oral minimal model.健康和糖尿病前期受试者的肝脏胰岛素敏感性:从双示踪剂到单示踪剂口服最小模型
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Jul 15;309(2):E161-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00358.2014. Epub 2015 May 19.
10
Surrogate estimates of insulin sensitivity in obese youth along the spectrum of glucose tolerance from normal to prediabetes to diabetes.肥胖青少年人群中,葡萄糖耐量从正常到糖尿病前期到糖尿病的不同阶段,胰岛素敏感性的替代估计值。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jul;96(7):2136-45. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2813. Epub 2011 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Study protocol, menu design, and rationale for a study testing the effects of a whole fruit-rich diet on glycemic control, liver fat, pancreatic fat, and cardiovascular health in adults with type 2 diabetes.一项关于富含完整水果饮食对2型糖尿病成年人血糖控制、肝脏脂肪、胰腺脂肪和心血管健康影响的研究的研究方案、菜单设计及理论依据。
Nutr Res. 2025 Mar;135:82-100. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2025.01.008. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
2
Trajectory of beta cell function and insulin clearance in stage 2 type 1 diabetes: natural history and response to teplizumab.1型糖尿病2期β细胞功能和胰岛素清除率的轨迹:自然史及对替普珠单抗的反应
Diabetologia. 2025 Mar;68(3):646-661. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06323-0. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
3
Postprandial Glucose Turnover Differs Between Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Triple Tracer Mixed Meal Study.
1型糖尿病青少年与成人的餐后葡萄糖周转率不同:三重示踪混合餐研究
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Feb 18;110(3):730-738. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae585.
4
Estimating insulin sensitivity and β-cell function from the oral glucose tolerance test: validation of a new insulin sensitivity and secretion (ISS) model.从口服葡萄糖耐量试验估计胰岛素敏感性和β细胞功能:新的胰岛素敏感性和分泌(ISS)模型的验证。
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Apr 1;326(4):E454-E471. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00189.2023. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
5
Increased Insulin Secretion and Glucose Effectiveness in Obese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes following Bariatric Surgery.肥胖 2 型糖尿病患者行减重手术后胰岛素分泌增加和葡萄糖作用增强。
J Diabetes Res. 2023 Nov 14;2023:7127426. doi: 10.1155/2023/7127426. eCollection 2023.
6
Heptanoate Improves Compensatory Mechanism of Glucose Homeostasis in Mitochondrial Long-Chain Fatty Acid Oxidation Defect.庚酸可改善线粒体长链脂肪酸氧化缺陷的葡萄糖稳态补偿机制。
Nutrients. 2023 Nov 5;15(21):4689. doi: 10.3390/nu15214689.
7
Incretin effect determines glucose trajectory and insulin sensitivity in youths with obesity.肠促胰岛素效应决定肥胖青少年的血糖轨迹和胰岛素敏感性。
JCI Insight. 2023 Nov 22;8(22):e165709. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.165709.
8
β-Cell Function and Insulin Sensitivity in Youth With Early Type 1 Diabetes From a 2-Hour 7-Sample OGTT.青年起病 1 型糖尿病患者行 2 小时 7 点 OGTT 试验后的胰岛β细胞功能和胰岛素敏感性评估
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 May 17;108(6):1376-1386. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac740.
9
A glucose-insulin-glucagon coupled model of the isoglycemic intravenous glucose infusion experiment.等血糖静脉葡萄糖输注实验的葡萄糖-胰岛素-胰高血糖素耦合模型。
Front Physiol. 2022 Sep 6;13:911616. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.911616. eCollection 2022.
10
Response to Comment on "Minimal and Maximal Models to Quantitate Glucose Metabolism: Tools to Measure, to Simulate and to Run in Silico Clinical Trials".对《定量葡萄糖代谢的最小和最大模型:用于测量、模拟和进行计算机临床试验的工具》评论的回应
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Sep;16(5):1346-1347. doi: 10.1177/19322968211060069. Epub 2021 Nov 29.