Steinijans V W, Sauter R, Jonkman J H, Schulz H U, Stricker H, Blume H
Department of Biometry, Byk Gulden Research Laboratories, Konstanz, Germany.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1992;30 Suppl 1:S31-6.
Bioequivalence of different preparations of the same drug substance has gained considerable importance over the last few years due to increasing generic substitution. The procedure that the manufacturer of the generic test preparation has to show bioequivalence with an appropriate reference preparation is scientifically accepted and laid down in international regulations. However, the necessity of single- vs multiple-dose bioequivalence studies has not been discussed in detail with the exception of the Dutch and US guidelines on sustained-release theophylline formulations, where multiple-dose studies are specifically required. This paper compares the conclusions drawn from single- and multiple-dose studies in the same subjects and recommends appropriate pharmacokinetic characteristics.
在过去几年中,由于仿制药替代的增加,同一药物不同制剂的生物等效性变得相当重要。仿制药试验制剂制造商必须证明其与适当的参比制剂具有生物等效性,这一程序已得到科学认可并在国际法规中有所规定。然而,除了荷兰和美国关于缓释茶碱制剂的指南特别要求进行多剂量研究外,单剂量与多剂量生物等效性研究的必要性尚未得到详细讨论。本文比较了在同一受试者中进行单剂量和多剂量研究所得出的结论,并推荐了适当的药代动力学特征。