Suppr超能文献

生物等效性研究:单剂量与多剂量

Bioequivalence studies: single vs multiple dose.

作者信息

Steinijans V W, Sauter R, Jonkman J H, Schulz H U, Stricker H, Blume H

机构信息

Department of Biometry, Byk Gulden Research Laboratories, Konstanz, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1992;30 Suppl 1:S31-6.

PMID:1601529
Abstract

Bioequivalence of different preparations of the same drug substance has gained considerable importance over the last few years due to increasing generic substitution. The procedure that the manufacturer of the generic test preparation has to show bioequivalence with an appropriate reference preparation is scientifically accepted and laid down in international regulations. However, the necessity of single- vs multiple-dose bioequivalence studies has not been discussed in detail with the exception of the Dutch and US guidelines on sustained-release theophylline formulations, where multiple-dose studies are specifically required. This paper compares the conclusions drawn from single- and multiple-dose studies in the same subjects and recommends appropriate pharmacokinetic characteristics.

摘要

在过去几年中,由于仿制药替代的增加,同一药物不同制剂的生物等效性变得相当重要。仿制药试验制剂制造商必须证明其与适当的参比制剂具有生物等效性,这一程序已得到科学认可并在国际法规中有所规定。然而,除了荷兰和美国关于缓释茶碱制剂的指南特别要求进行多剂量研究外,单剂量与多剂量生物等效性研究的必要性尚未得到详细讨论。本文比较了在同一受试者中进行单剂量和多剂量研究所得出的结论,并推荐了适当的药代动力学特征。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验