An Evaluation of Medical Book Reviews.
作者信息
Wilson J E
机构信息
The Library, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore.
出版信息
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1945 Jul;33(3):305-14.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
An Evaluation of Medical Book Reviews.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1945 Jul;33(3):305-14.
2
The pornographic anatomy book? The curious tale of the Anatomical Basis of Medical Practice.
Acad Med. 2009 Feb;84(2):278-83. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819391e2.
3
Book reviewers and book reviews: potential conflict of interest.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Apr;62(4):446. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.02.045.
4
Influence of open- and closed-book tests on medical students' learning approaches.
Med Educ. 2008 Oct;42(10):967-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03125.x.
5
The joy of reviewing: a short guide to writing book and media reviews.
Fam Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;41(7):492-3.
6
Open book tests: assessment of academic learning in clerkships.
Med Teach. 2005 Aug;27(5):456-62. doi: 10.1080/01421590500097075.
7
Reviewing medical books: a quarter century of observations.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 Nov;59(5):e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.05.023.
8
Open-book tests to complement assessment-programmes: analysis of open and closed-book tests.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Aug;13(3):263-73. doi: 10.1007/s10459-006-9038-y. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
9
Thirty years of the Paediatric Standard Treatment Book.
P N G Med J. 2006 Sep-Dec;49(3-4):147-55.
10
[Book: The Rabbit from the series About Animals].
Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 2004;129(14-15):489; author reply 489.
引用本文的文献
1
How to write a scholarly book review for publication in a peer-reviewed journal: a review of the literature.
J Chiropr Educ. 2010 Spring;24(1):57-69. doi: 10.7899/1042-5055-24.1.57.
2
Research and medical librarianship.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1957 Jul;45(3):399-403.
3
Current status of biomedical book reviewing. II. Time lag in biomedical book reviewing.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1974 Apr;62(2):113-9.
Zotero 插件