Suppr超能文献

生物医学图书评审的现状。二、生物医学图书评审中的时间滞后

Current status of biomedical book reviewing. II. Time lag in biomedical book reviewing.

作者信息

Chen C C

出版信息

Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1974 Apr;62(2):113-9.

Abstract

This part of the study explores the effectiveness of the review media in terms of speed of reviewing, comprehensiveness of review treatment, and authority. The time lags for the fifty-four journals varied widely, the mean ranging from 5.8 months to forty-two months. The time lags for all 3,347 reviews varied even more widely, ranging from less than a month to 108 months after a book was off the press. The 3,347 reviews had a mean time lag of 10.43 months and a standard deviation of 6.63 months.

摘要

本研究的这一部分从评审速度、评审处理的全面性和权威性方面探讨了评审媒体的有效性。54种期刊的时间间隔差异很大,平均从5.8个月到42个月不等。所有3347篇书评的时间间隔差异更大,从书籍出版后不到一个月到108个月不等。3347篇书评的平均时间间隔为10.43个月,标准差为6.63个月。

相似文献

5
Medical book reviewing.医学书籍评论
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1983 Apr;71(2):202-6.
7
Book reviews in medical journals.医学期刊中的书评
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1986 Jan;74(1):1-5.
9
The Journal's book review policy.
N Engl J Med. 1983 Mar 17;308(11):657-8.
10
Reviewing our book reviews: fifty years and counting.
Gerontologist. 2011 Oct;51(5):581-2. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr094.

本文引用的文献

1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验