Suppr超能文献

两种估算吡虫啉和呋喃丹土壤吸附量方法的比较。

Comparison of two methods for estimation of soil sorption for imidacloprid and carbofuran.

作者信息

Yazgan M S, Wilkins R M, Sykas C, Hoque E

机构信息

Ecotoxicology Research Group, School of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.

出版信息

Chemosphere. 2005 Sep;60(9):1325-31. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.01.075.

Abstract

Predicting the fate and transport of pesticides in soil environment is an important issue especially in understanding and modelling of the environmental behaviour of pesticides. Classical batch sorption method often has been identified as insufficient to derive the actual extent of sorption. In this study, the batch equilibrium method was compared to the centrifugation method, which can permit measurement of sorption under more natural conditions. The results of the comparison of the batch with the centrifugation method for imidacloprid and carbofuran pesticides indicate that the batch method overestimates sorption in comparison to the centrifugation method. These results are in agreement with others, which use high soil:solution ratios with batch and those that used the centrifugation method.

摘要

预测农药在土壤环境中的归宿和迁移是一个重要问题,尤其是在理解和模拟农药的环境行为方面。经典的批量吸附法常常被认为不足以得出实际的吸附程度。在本研究中,将批量平衡法与离心法进行了比较,离心法能够在更自然的条件下测量吸附。吡虫啉和克百威农药的批量法与离心法比较结果表明,与离心法相比,批量法高估了吸附。这些结果与其他使用高土壤:溶液比的批量法以及使用离心法的研究结果一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验