Hoye Angela, van Mieghem Carlos A G, Ong Andrew T L, Aoki Jiro, Rodriguez Granillo Gaston A, Valgimigli Marco, Tsuchida Keiichi, Sianos Georgios, McFadden Eugene P, van der Giessen Willem J, de Feyter Pim J, van Domburg Ron T, Serruys Patrick W
Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Cardiovasc Intervent. 2005;7(1):36-40. doi: 10.1080/14628840510011225.
The most effective strategy for bifurcation stenting is currently undefined. The Culotte technique was developed as a method that ensures complete bifurcation lesion coverage. However, it went out of favour due to a high rate of restenosis when utilizing bare metal stents. Drug-eluting stents reduce the rate of restenosis and need for repeat lesion revascularization compared with bare metal stents; we re-evaluated this technique with drug-eluting stent implantation.
Between April 2002 and October 2003, 207 patients were treated for at least one bifurcation lesion with drug-eluting stent implantation to both the main vessel and side branch. Of these, 23 were treated with the Culotte technique (11.1%) for 24 lesions. Sirolimus-eluting stents were used in 8.3%, and paclitaxel-eluting stents in the remaining 92.7%.
Clinical follow-up was obtained in 100%. One patient had a myocardial infarction at 14 days (maximum rise in creatine kinase 872 IU/L) related to thrombosis occurring in another lesion, and underwent repeat revascularization. There were no episodes of stent thrombosis in the Culotte lesions. At eight months follow-up, there were no deaths and no further myocardial infarction. One patient required target lesion revascularization (TLR), and a second underwent target vessel revascularization. The cumulative rates of survival-free of TLR and major adverse cardiac events were 94.7% and 84.6% respectively. Angiographic follow-up was obtained in 16 patients (69.6%) at a mean period of 8.3+/-4.3 months. The late lumen loss for the main vessel and side branch were 0.48+/-0.56 mm and 0.53+/-0.33 mm respectively, with binary restenosis rates of 18.8% and 12.5%.
In this small study of bifurcation stenting utilizing the Culotte technique with drug-eluting stent implantation, there was a low rate of major adverse events and need for target lesion revascularization at eight months, when compared with historical data of bifurcation stenting with bare metal stents. Further re-evaluation of this technique utilizing drug-eluting stents, is warranted in the setting of larger randomized studies.
目前尚不清楚分叉病变支架置入的最有效策略。裤裙式(Culotte)技术是作为一种确保完全覆盖分叉病变的方法而开发的。然而,在使用裸金属支架时,由于再狭窄率高,该技术不再受欢迎。与裸金属支架相比,药物洗脱支架可降低再狭窄率和再次进行病变血管重建的需求;我们使用药物洗脱支架植入术对该技术进行了重新评估。
在2002年4月至2003年10月期间,207例患者接受了主血管和侧支均植入药物洗脱支架的至少一处分叉病变的治疗。其中,23例(11.1%)采用裤裙式技术治疗24处病变。8.3%的患者使用西罗莫司洗脱支架,其余92.7%的患者使用紫杉醇洗脱支架。
100%的患者获得了临床随访。1例患者在14天时发生心肌梗死(肌酸激酶最高升高至872 IU/L),与另一处病变发生的血栓形成有关,随后接受了再次血管重建。裤裙式技术治疗的病变中未发生支架血栓形成事件。在8个月的随访中,无死亡病例,也无进一步的心肌梗死发生。1例患者需要进行靶病变血管重建(TLR),另1例患者接受了靶血管重建。无TLR生存和主要不良心脏事件的累积发生率分别为94.7%和84.6%。16例患者(69.6%)在平均8.3±4.3个月时进行了血管造影随访。主血管和侧支的晚期管腔丢失分别为0.48±0.56 mm和0.53±0.33 mm,二元再狭窄率分别为18.8%和12.5%。
在这项使用裤裙式技术并植入药物洗脱支架治疗分叉病变的小型研究中,与裸金属支架治疗分叉病变的历史数据相比,8个月时主要不良事件发生率和靶病变血管重建需求较低。在更大规模的随机研究中,有必要对使用药物洗脱支架的该技术进行进一步重新评估。