Sukhija Rishi, Mehta Jawahar L, Sachdeva Rajesh
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
Clin Cardiol. 2008 Feb;31(2):63-6. doi: 10.1002/clc.20177.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcation lesions is technically limited by the risk of side branch occlusion. In comparison with nonbifurcation interventions, bifurcation interventions have a lower rate of procedural success, higher procedural costs and a higher rate of clinical and angiographic restenosis. The recent introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) has resulted in reduced incidence of main vessel restenosis compared with historical controls. However, side-branch ostial residual stenosis and long-term restenosis still remain problematic. In the era of DES, techniques employing two stents have emerged that allow stenting of the large side branch in addition to the main artery. Stenting of the main vessel with provisional side branch stenting seems to be the prevailing approach. This paper reviews outcome data with different treatment modalities for this complex lesion with particular emphasis on the use of DES as well as potential new therapeutic approaches.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)用于分叉病变时,在技术上受到边支闭塞风险的限制。与非分叉病变的介入治疗相比,分叉病变的介入治疗手术成功率较低、手术成本较高,临床和血管造影再狭窄率也较高。与历史对照相比,近期药物洗脱支架(DES)的引入已使主血管再狭窄的发生率降低。然而,边支开口处的残余狭窄和长期再狭窄仍然是问题。在DES时代,已出现采用双支架的技术,除了主血管外还能对大的边支进行支架置入。主血管支架置入并临时对边支进行支架置入似乎是主要的方法。本文回顾了针对这种复杂病变采用不同治疗方式的结果数据,特别强调了DES的使用以及潜在的新治疗方法。