Langeluddecke Pauline M, Lucas Sara K
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005 Jul;27(5):576-90. doi: 10.1080/13803390490918372.
Published information pertaining to the clinical utility of the WMS-III in assessing memory impairment in traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains inadequate. WMS-III findings are reported for 180 litigants with post-acute moderate to extremely severe TBI, classified into three groups according to injury severity, and a healthy control group. A significant "dose-response" relationship was found between memory impairment and TBI severity for most of the WMS-III indexes and subtests. Effect sizes were large for the Immediate and General Memory Indexes and medium for the Working Memory Index. In general, TBI had a greater effect on the Visual than Auditory Indexes. Effect sizes were greatest for Family Pictures and least for the auditory recognition and working memory tasks. Group findings indicate the immediate memory tasks to be clinically useful in relation to a severe or extremely severe TBI, but not for less severe trauma. Delayed memory tasks do not provide information additional to that obtained from immediate memory measures. The revised Tulsky indexes are no more sensitive to the effects of TBI than the original ones. Differences between WMS-III memory indexes are unlikely to be of diagnostic utility although memory-intelligence discrepancies may be.
已发表的关于韦氏记忆量表第三版(WMS - III)在评估创伤性脑损伤(TBI)记忆损害方面临床效用的信息仍然不足。报告了180名急性中度至极重度TBI诉讼当事人的WMS - III结果,这些当事人根据损伤严重程度分为三组,并与一个健康对照组进行比较。对于大多数WMS - III指标和子测试,发现记忆损害与TBI严重程度之间存在显著的“剂量反应”关系。即时记忆指数和一般记忆指数的效应量较大,工作记忆指数的效应量中等。总体而言,TBI对视觉指数的影响大于听觉指数。家庭图片的效应量最大,听觉识别和工作记忆任务的效应量最小。分组结果表明,即时记忆任务对于严重或极重度TBI在临床上有用,但对较轻的创伤则不然。延迟记忆任务并未提供超出即时记忆测量所获得的额外信息。修订后的图尔斯基指数对TBI影响的敏感性并不比原来的指数更高。WMS - III记忆指数之间的差异不太可能具有诊断效用,尽管记忆与智力的差异可能有用。