Langeluddecke Pauline M, Lucas Sara K
Private Practice, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 May;17(2):273-84. doi: 10.1076/clin.17.2.273.16499.
WAIS-III findings were reported for 150 litigants, classified into three groups according to severity of traumatic brain injury (TBI), and a general population control group. There was a significant "dose response" relationship between TBI severity and all Index/IQ scores. Effect size was greatest for the Processing Speed Index (PSI). Between group differences were significant on all subtests except Information and Digit Span. Effect sizes were greatest for Digit Symbol, Symbol Search, Similarities, and Picture Arrangement. Relative to the control group, there was a significant difference for the Severe and Extremely Severe TBI groups on all IQ/Index scores and most subtests. The Moderate TBI group differed significantly on one Index (the PSI) and none of the subtests. Clinical implications of the findings are discussed in relation to the utility of the WAIS-III in assessing the cognitive sequelae of TBI, the use of current WAIS-III IQ scores to assess intelligence-memory discrepancies, WAIS-III short forms, and estimation of premorbid intelligence.
报告了150名诉讼当事人的韦氏成人智力量表第三版(WAIS-III)测试结果,这些当事人根据创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的严重程度分为三组,并与一个普通人群对照组进行比较。TBI严重程度与所有指数/智商得分之间存在显著的“剂量反应”关系。处理速度指数(PSI)的效应量最大。除信息和数字广度外,所有子测试的组间差异均显著。数字符号、符号搜索、相似性和图片排列的效应量最大。相对于对照组,重度和极重度TBI组在所有智商/指数得分和大多数子测试上均存在显著差异。中度TBI组在一个指数(PSI)上存在显著差异,在任何子测试上均无显著差异。研究结果的临床意义围绕WAIS-III在评估TBI认知后遗症中的效用、使用当前WAIS-III智商得分评估智力-记忆差异、WAIS-III简式以及病前智力估计进行了讨论。