Massof Robert W
Lions Vision Research and Rehabilitation Center, Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2005 Apr;12(2):103-24. doi: 10.1080/09286580590932789.
To test hypotheses that low vision patient responses to visual function rating scale questionnaires conform to an additive conjoint structure and that the Likert score is a sufficient statistic for the latent patient trait; to compare results for two competing stochastic measurement models; and to determine if different questionnaires measure the same construct in low vision patients.
Visual function rating scale questionnaires were administered to 284 low vision subjects by telephone. Each subject was administered two of four questionnaires: ADVS, NEI VFQ-25 plus supplement, expanded VAQ, and VF-14.
Data were analyzed with the Muraki item response model and the Andrich measurement model. The estimates of latent person, item, and response threshold measures from the two models are linearly related. The Muraki model produced a better overall fit to the item response data, the Andrich model produced a better fit to the average ratings for each person and item. Fit statistics for the Andrich model were proportional to the item-dependent discrimination parameter in the Muraki model. The ADVS was the most accurate measure and the NEI VFQ was the least. Reliability was similar for all four instruments. Person measures for each pair of instruments were linearly related indicating that all four instruments measured the same construct. The person measure estimate from the Andrich model is monotonic with the average rating. That relationship suggests a transformation of the Likert score that can correct the floor and ceiling effects in rating scale data.
Patient responses to all four questionnaires conform to varying degrees to an additive conjoint structure. The Likert score is a sufficient statistic for the ADVS and the VAQ, but not for the NEI VFQ or VF-14. All four instruments measure the same construct in the low vision population, but they differ in measurement accuracy and precision.
检验以下假设:低视力患者对视觉功能评定量表问卷的反应符合加法联合结构,且李克特分数是潜在患者特质的充分统计量;比较两种相互竞争的随机测量模型的结果;确定不同问卷是否测量低视力患者的相同结构。
通过电话向284名低视力受试者发放视觉功能评定量表问卷。每位受试者接受四份问卷中的两份:ADVS、NEI VFQ - 25加补充问卷、扩展VAQ和VF - 14。
使用村木项目反应模型和安德里奇测量模型对数据进行分析。两个模型对潜在个体、项目和反应阈值测量的估计呈线性相关。村木模型对项目反应数据的整体拟合更好,安德里奇模型对每个人和每个项目的平均评分拟合更好。安德里奇模型的拟合统计量与村木模型中依赖项目的区分参数成比例。ADVS是最准确的测量工具,NEI VFQ是最不准确的。所有四种工具的信度相似。每对工具的个体测量呈线性相关,表明所有四种工具测量的是相同结构。安德里奇模型的个体测量估计与平均评分呈单调关系。这种关系表明可以对李克特分数进行变换,以校正评定量表数据中的地板效应和天花板效应。
患者对所有四份问卷的反应在不同程度上符合加法联合结构。李克特分数是ADVS和VAQ的充分统计量,但不是NEI VFQ或VF - 14的充分统计量。所有四种工具在低视力人群中测量的是相同结构,但在测量准确性和精确性方面存在差异。