Zhao Kristin, Yang Chao, Zhao Chunfeng, An Kai-Nan
Biomechanics Laboratory, Division of Orthopedic Research, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
J Biomech. 2005 Sep;38(9):1943-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.07.029.
This study compared the accuracy of new, FDA-approved, image-analysis software to conventional radiographic assessment techniques for the measurement of intervertebral motion. Six adult human cadaveric lumbar spines (L1-S1) were individually mounted in a custom Plexiglas device and electromagnetic sensors were rigidly mounted to the spinous processes of L3, L4, and L5. Lateral radiographs of the spines in neutral, full flexion, and full extension were digitized and analyzed both using the software and manually by three orthopedic surgeons. Compared to intervertebral rotations determined from the electromagnetic device, the errors in rotations reported by the software and surgeons were 0.47+/-0.24 degrees and 2.16+/-0.78 degrees , respectively. Rotations measured by the surgeons were significantly less accurate and more variable than that of the software (p<0.05).
本研究比较了美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的新型图像分析软件与传统X线评估技术在测量椎间运动方面的准确性。六具成人尸体腰椎(L1-S1)分别安装在定制的有机玻璃装置中,电磁传感器被牢固地安装在L3、L4和L5的棘突上。对脊柱在中立位、完全屈曲和完全伸展位的侧位X线片进行数字化处理,并使用该软件进行分析,同时由三位骨科医生手动分析。与通过电磁装置确定的椎间旋转相比,软件和医生报告的旋转误差分别为0.47±0.24度和2.16±0.78度。医生测量的旋转准确性明显低于软件,且变异性更大(p<0.05)。