Keller B P J A, Lubbert P H W, Keller E, Leenen L P H
Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Injury. 2005 Aug;36(8):946-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.09.017.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare tissue-interface pressures on three different support-surfaces for trauma patients. The support-surfaces were a semi soft overlay mattress, a vacuum mattress and a spine board. Tissue-interface pressures were measured in a standardised way between the scapulae, the sacrum, the heels and the different support-surfaces in 20 healthy volunteers. Appreciation of comfort of the support-surface was assessed using a 10-point visual analog scale. High and potentially ischaemic interface pressures were found on all three support-surfaces, with the highest pressures (exceeding 170 mmHg) measured on the spine board. The spine board got the worst comfort score. It was also noted that no support was given to the normal lumbar lordosis by the spine board. There is a need for new support-surfaces for trauma patients, which reduce interface pressures and are comfortable.
本研究的目的是评估和比较创伤患者在三种不同支撑面上的组织界面压力。支撑面分别为半软覆盖床垫、真空床垫和脊柱板。在20名健康志愿者中,以标准化方式测量了肩胛骨、骶骨、足跟与不同支撑面之间的组织界面压力。使用10分视觉模拟量表评估对支撑面舒适度的评价。在所有三种支撑面上均发现了较高且可能导致缺血的界面压力,其中脊柱板上测得的压力最高(超过170 mmHg)。脊柱板的舒适度评分最差。还注意到脊柱板未对正常腰椎前凸提供支撑。创伤患者需要新的支撑面,以降低界面压力并提高舒适度。