Kneebone A C, Luszcz M A, Baker R A, Knight J L
Department of Psychological Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park 5042, Australia.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Aug;76(8):1121-7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.047456.
Studies of neuropsychological outcome following coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) have traditionally dichotomised patients as "impaired" or "unimpaired". This conceals the potential heterogeneity of deficits due to different mechanisms and sites of brain injury.
To explore neuropsychological outcome following CABG and determine to what extent it conforms to prototypic cortical and/or subcortical neurobehavioral syndromes and whether different intraoperative physiologic measures are associated with different subtypes of neuropsychological outcome.
Neuropsychological tests were administered to 85 patients before and after elective CABG and to 50 matched normal control subjects. Pre- to postoperative change scores were computed using standardised regression based norms. Change scores on selected memory measures were subjected to cluster analysis to identify qualitatively distinct subtypes of memory outcome. Emergent clusters were compared on non-memory measures, intraoperative physiologic measures, and demographic variables.
Three subtypes of memory outcome were identified: memory spared (48% of patients), retrieval deficit (35%), and encoding/storage deficit (17%). Contrary to expectation, the subgroups were indistinguishable on measures of confrontation naming and manual dexterity and on intraoperative cardiac surgical physiologic measures and demographic variables. The encoding/storage deficit subgroup exhibited executive dysfunction.
Heterogeneous profiles of neuropsychological dysfunction were found following CABG although they did not tightly conform to prototypic cortical and subcortical neurobehavioral syndromes. This challenges the value and appropriateness of the common practice of collapsing individual test scores to arrive at a single figure to define "impairment". Whether different subtypes of neuropsychological outcome are caused by different pathophysiologic mechanisms remains unknown.
传统上,冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)后神经心理学结果的研究将患者分为“受损”或“未受损”两类。这掩盖了由于脑损伤的不同机制和部位导致的缺陷的潜在异质性。
探讨冠状动脉搭桥术后的神经心理学结果,确定其在多大程度上符合典型的皮质和/或皮质下神经行为综合征,以及不同的术中生理指标是否与不同亚型的神经心理学结果相关。
对85例择期冠状动脉搭桥术患者术前和术后以及50例匹配的正常对照者进行神经心理学测试。使用基于标准化回归的常模计算术前至术后的变化分数。对选定记忆测量指标的变化分数进行聚类分析,以识别记忆结果在性质上不同的亚型。在非记忆测量指标、术中生理指标和人口统计学变量方面对出现的聚类进行比较。
确定了三种记忆结果亚型:记忆未受损(48%的患者)、提取缺陷(35%)和编码/存储缺陷(17%)。与预期相反,在面对命名和手动灵活性测量指标、术中心脏手术生理指标和人口统计学变量方面,各亚组之间没有差异。编码/存储缺陷亚组表现出执行功能障碍。
冠状动脉搭桥术后发现了神经心理功能障碍的异质性特征,尽管它们并不完全符合典型的皮质和皮质下神经行为综合征。这对将个体测试分数合并以得出单一数字来定义“损伤”的常见做法的价值和适当性提出了挑战。神经心理学结果的不同亚型是否由不同的病理生理机制引起仍不清楚。