Looi J C, Sachdev P S
Neuropsychiatric Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Romwick, Australia.
Neurology. 1999 Sep 11;53(4):670-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.4.670.
The concept of vascular dementia (VaD) is currently in a state of evolution. Memory impairment is emphasized as a primary criterion, reflecting the influence of AD on the concept of dementia. We have systematically reviewed whether the nature of neuropsychological dysfunction is distinct in AD and VaD, and whether similar defining criteria for the concept of dementia in both disorders can be supported.
We searched five bibliographic databases (Medline, Biological Abstracts, EMBASE, PsychINFO, PsychLIT) for research articles in which VaD and AD had been compared using neuropsychological tests and that met criteria for scientific merit.
Of the 45 studies, 18 were excluded because of inadequacies, and the remaining 27 were analyzed. There were a number of similarities of dysfunction between VaD and AD. However, when matched for age, education, and severity of dementia, VaD patients had relatively superior function in verbal long-term memory and more impairment in frontal executive functioning compared with AD patients. Interpretation of the results is limited by uncertainty in diagnostic criteria for VaD, possible inclusion bias due to use of clinical diagnosis alone, possible overlap of AD and VaD, and the methodologic shortcomings of some studies.
The neuropsychological differentiation of VaD from AD was consistent with the different neuroimaging findings in the two disorders, and argues for differential criteria for the definition of the syndromes. The simple application of Alzheimer's dementia criteria to VaD, with the inclusion of cerebrovascular disease etiology, may not be sufficient to capture the uniqueness of VaD.
血管性痴呆(VaD)的概念目前正处于演变之中。记忆障碍被强调为主要标准,这反映了阿尔茨海默病(AD)对痴呆概念的影响。我们系统地回顾了AD和VaD中神经心理功能障碍的本质是否不同,以及这两种疾病中痴呆概念的类似定义标准是否能够得到支持。
我们在五个文献数据库(医学索引数据库、生物学文摘数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、心理学文摘数据库、心理学文献数据库)中搜索了使用神经心理测试比较VaD和AD且符合科学价值标准的研究文章。
45项研究中,18项因存在缺陷被排除,其余27项进行了分析。VaD和AD之间存在一些功能障碍的相似之处。然而,在年龄、教育程度和痴呆严重程度相匹配时,与AD患者相比,VaD患者在言语长期记忆方面功能相对较好,而在额叶执行功能方面受损更严重。结果的解释受到VaD诊断标准的不确定性、仅使用临床诊断可能导致的纳入偏倚、AD和VaD可能的重叠以及一些研究的方法学缺陷的限制。
VaD与AD在神经心理方面的差异与这两种疾病不同的神经影像学表现一致,这支持了对这两种综合征定义采用不同标准。简单地将阿尔茨海默病痴呆标准应用于VaD,并纳入脑血管病病因,可能不足以体现VaD的独特性。