• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A comparison of stratified and adjusted trend tests for binomial proportions.

作者信息

Leuraud Klervi, Benichou Jacques

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, University of Rouen Medical School and Rouen University Hospital, France.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2006 Feb 15;25(3):529-35. doi: 10.1002/sim.2239.

DOI:10.1002/sim.2239
PMID:16025544
Abstract

For the problem of testing for a monotonic trend between an ordinal exposure and a binary response while controlling for categorical cofactors, we derived stratified and adjusted versions of two single contrast tests. Using simulations, we compared their statistical properties to those of the commonly used stratified Mantel-extension trend (MET) test. All tests had high power in case of monotonic relationships between exposure and response. In case of non-monotonic relationships, the stratified and adjusted contrast tests were markedly less powerful than the stratified MET-test particularly for five exposure levels, a favourable feature when the aim is to test for the existence of a monotonic dose-response relationship. These results are illustrated by an example.

摘要

相似文献

1
A comparison of stratified and adjusted trend tests for binomial proportions.
Stat Med. 2006 Feb 15;25(3):529-35. doi: 10.1002/sim.2239.
2
A comparison of several methods to test for the existence of a monotonic dose-response relationship in clinical and epidemiological studies.几种用于检验临床和流行病学研究中单调剂量反应关系是否存在的方法的比较。
Stat Med. 2001 Nov 30;20(22):3335-51. doi: 10.1002/sim.959.
3
An alternative test for trend in exposure-response analysis.暴露-反应分析中趋势的一种替代检验。
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1998 Jan-Mar;8(1):9-15.
4
Tests of non-null hypothesis on proportions for stratified data.
Stat Med. 2008 Apr 30;27(9):1429-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.3023.
5
Order-restricted tests for stratified comparisons of binomial proportions.用于二项比例分层比较的序贯受限检验。
Biometrics. 1996 Sep;52(3):1103-11.
6
An efficient and exact approach for detecting trends with binary endpoints.一种用于检测二分类结局趋势的高效准确方法。
Stat Med. 2012 Jan 30;31(2):155-64. doi: 10.1002/sim.4411. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
7
Ordered multiple comparisons with the best and their applications to dose-response studies.与最佳值的有序多重比较及其在剂量反应研究中的应用。
Biometrics. 2007 Dec;63(4):1143-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00813.x. Epub 2007 May 8.
8
Partition testing in dose-response studies with multiple endpoints.具有多个终点的剂量反应研究中的分割测试。
Pharm Stat. 2007 Jul-Sep;6(3):181-92. doi: 10.1002/pst.295.
9
Poly-k-trend tests for survival adjusted analysis of tumor rates formulated as approximate multiple contrast test.
J Biopharm Stat. 2008;18(5):934-48. doi: 10.1080/10543400802294285.
10
Evaluation of the statistical power for multiple tests: a case study.多重检验的统计功效评估:一个案例研究
Pharm Stat. 2009 Jan-Mar;8(1):5-11. doi: 10.1002/pst.319.