Patenaude Christian, Massicotte Guy, Lacaille Jean-Claude
Centre de Recherche en Sciences Neurologiques et Département de Physiologie, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128 Succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3C 3J7.
Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Jul;22(1):179-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04207.x.
Abstract In hippocampal pyramidal cells, the efficacy of synaptic transmission at gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic synapses, is modulated by activity. However, whether such plasticity occurs at inhibitory synapses on interneurons remains largely unknown. Using whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings of inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) in Sprague-Dawley rat hippocampal slices, we examined whether GABA synapses of stratum radiatum interneurons were affected by stimulation protocols known to alter efficacy at inhibitory synapses of CA1 pyramidal cells. Monosynaptically evoked IPSCs (eIPSCs) exhibited different properties with significantly faster kinetics, higher coefficients of variation, a current-voltage (I-V) relationship shifted to depolarized values and a smaller paired-pulse depression, in interneurons than in pyramidal cells. GABA synapses on interneurons also showed a different capacity for plasticity. Indeed, theta-burst stimulation induced a long-term potentiation of eIPSCs in both cell types, but the induction mechanisms differed in interneurons, as it was not affected by antagonists of GABAB receptors and group I/II metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). Furthermore, 100-Hz tetanization selectively elicited a short-term depression of eIPSCs in pyramidal cells. A postsynaptic depolarization produced a transient suppression of eIPSCs (depolarization-induced suppression of inhibition) in pyramidal cells but not in interneurons. Spontaneous IPSCs were similarly reduced following depolarization in pyramidal cells, but not in interneurons. These results indicate that GABA synapses of stratum radiatum interneurons exhibit different properties and capacity for activity-dependent plasticity than those of pyramidal cells. This cell-type specific mode of transmission and adaptive regulation of GABA synapses may contribute to hippocampal plasticity and functions.
摘要 在海马锥体细胞中,γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)能突触的突触传递效能受活动调节。然而,这种可塑性是否发生在中间神经元的抑制性突触上仍 largely 未知。利用斯普拉格-道利大鼠海马脑片抑制性突触后电流(IPSCs)的全细胞电压钳记录,我们研究了辐射层中间神经元的GABA突触是否受已知可改变CA1锥体细胞抑制性突触效能的刺激方案影响。单突触诱发的IPSCs(eIPSCs)在中间神经元中表现出不同的特性,其动力学明显更快、变异系数更高、电流-电压(I-V)关系向去极化值偏移且配对脉冲抑制更小,与锥体细胞不同。中间神经元上的GABA突触也表现出不同的可塑性能力。确实,θ波爆发刺激在两种细胞类型中均诱导了eIPSCs的长期增强,但中间神经元中的诱导机制不同,因为它不受GABAB受体和I/II组代谢型谷氨酸受体(mGluRs)拮抗剂的影响。此外,100Hz强直刺激在锥体细胞中选择性地引发了eIPSCs的短期抑制。突触后去极化在锥体细胞中产生了eIPSCs的瞬时抑制(去极化诱导的抑制抑制),但在中间神经元中未出现。锥体细胞去极化后自发IPSCs也同样减少,但中间神经元中未减少。这些结果表明,辐射层中间神经元的GABA突触与锥体细胞相比,表现出不同的特性和活动依赖性可塑性能力。这种细胞类型特异性的GABA突触传递模式和适应性调节可能有助于海马的可塑性和功能。