The "therapeutic orgy" and the "right to rot" collide: the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs under state law.
作者信息
Blackburn C E
机构信息
University of Louisville, School of Law, Louisville, KY, USA.
出版信息
Houst Law Rev. 1990 May;27(3):447-513.
PMID:16032811
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The "therapeutic orgy" and the "right to rot" collide: the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs under state law.“治疗狂欢”与“任其腐烂的权利”发生冲突：根据州法律拒绝使用抗精神病药物的权利。
Houst Law Rev. 1990 May;27(3):447-513.
2
Mental health advance directives: having one's say?精神健康预先指示：能表达自己的意愿吗？
KY Law J. 2000;89(2):327-86.
3
Reevaluating substantive due process as a source of protection for psychiatric patients to refuse drugs.重新评估实体性正当程序作为精神病患者拒绝用药保护来源的情况。
Indiana Law Rev. 1998;31(4):937-1017.
4
Presumed dangerous: California's selective policy of forcibly medicating state prisoners with antipsychotic drugs.被推定具有危险性：加利福尼亚州用抗精神病药物强制治疗州立监狱囚犯的选择性政策。
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev. 2002 Jan;35:483-517.
5
Fourteenth amendment--the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs masked by prison bars.第十四条修正案——被监狱铁窗掩盖的拒绝使用抗精神病药物的权利。
J Crim Law Criminol. 1991 Winter;81(4):952-80.
6
Forcible medication for courtroom competence--the case of Charles Sell.为判定法庭行为能力而进行的强制药物治疗——查尔斯·塞尔案
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 27;350(22):2297-301. doi: 10.1056/NEJMlim033389.
7
Forcible medication and personal autonomy: the case of Charles Thomas Sell.强制用药与个人自主权：查尔斯·托马斯·塞尔案
Boston Univ Law Rev. 2004 Feb;84(1):275-99.
8
The right of the mentally ill to refuse treatment revisited.
J Psychiatry Law. 1992 Fall;20(3):407-34. doi: 10.1177/009318539202000312.
9
Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption?治疗法理学与被收容的精神残疾人的民权：是无望的矛盾修辞还是救赎之路？
Psychol Public Policy Law. 1995 Mar;1(1):80-119.
10
Involuntary treatment of the mentally ill: autonomy is asking the wrong question.
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law. 2004 Aug(304):9-40.
Zotero 插件