Fung Constance H, Elliott Marc N, Hays Ron D, Kahn Katherine L, Kanouse David E, McGlynn Elizabeth A, Spranca Mark D, Shekelle Paul G
Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare Systems, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2005 Aug;40(4):957-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00395.x.
To assess patients' use of and preferences for information about technical and interpersonal quality when using simulated, computerized health care report cards to select a primary care provider (PCP).
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Primary data collected from 304 adult consumers living in Los Angeles County in January and February 2003.
STUDY DESIGN/DATA COLLECTION: We constructed computerized report cards for seven pairs of hypothetical individual PCPs (two internal validity check pairs included). Participants selected the physician that they preferred. A questionnaire collected demographic information and assessed participant attitudes towards different sources of report card information. The relationship between patient characteristics and number of times the participant selected the physician who excelled in technical quality are estimated using an ordered logit model.
Ninety percent of the sample selected the dominant physician for both validity checks, indicating a level of attention to task comparable with prior studies. When presented with pairs of physicians who varied in technical and interpersonal quality, two-thirds of the sample (95 percent CI: 62, 72 percent) chose the physician who was higher in technical quality at least three out of five times (one-sample binomial test of proportion). Age, gender, and ethnicity were not significant predictors of choosing the physician who was higher in technical quality.
These participants showed a strong preference for physicians of high technical quality when forced to make tradeoffs, but a substantial proportion of the sample preferred physicians of high interpersonal quality. Individual physician report cards should contain ample information in both domains to be most useful to patients.
评估患者在使用模拟的计算机化医疗保健报告卡选择初级保健医生(PCP)时,对技术质量和人际质量信息的使用情况及偏好。
数据来源/研究背景:2003年1月和2月从居住在洛杉矶县的304名成年消费者收集的原始数据。
研究设计/数据收集:我们为七对假设的个体初级保健医生构建了计算机化报告卡(包括两对内部效度检查对)。参与者选择他们更喜欢的医生。一份问卷收集了人口统计学信息,并评估了参与者对报告卡不同信息来源的态度。使用有序logit模型估计患者特征与参与者选择技术质量优秀的医生的次数之间的关系。
在两次效度检查中,90%的样本选择了占主导地位的医生,这表明对任务的关注程度与先前的研究相当。当面对技术质量和人际质量不同的医生对时,三分之二的样本(95%置信区间:62%,72%)至少五次中有三次选择了技术质量更高的医生(单样本二项式比例检验)。年龄、性别和种族不是选择技术质量更高的医生的显著预测因素。
当被迫做出权衡时,这些参与者强烈倾向于技术质量高的医生,但相当一部分样本更喜欢人际质量高的医生。个体医生报告卡应在这两个领域都包含充足的信息,以便对患者最有用。