Chang Wen-Chun, Torng Pao-Ling, Huang Su-Cheng, Sheu Bor-Ching, Hsu Wen-Chiung, Chen Ruey-Jien, Chow Song-Nan, Chang Daw-Yuan
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):336-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.05.006.
To evaluate the clinical outcomes of uterine artery ligation through retrograde tracking of the umbilical ligament (RUL) in laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH).
Prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).
University-affiliated hospital.
Two hundred twenty-five women with myomas or adenomyosis.
Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with uterine artery identification and ligation through RUL.
The median age of the patients was 46 years, and the median weight of the extirpated uteri was 340 g, with 26.2% of uteri weighing more than 500 g. The median operation time was 135 minutes, and the median blood loss was 50 mL. The median intramuscular meperidine requirements were 1 ampoule (50 mg), and the median hospital stay was 3 days. It took approximately 10 minutes from identification of the umbilical ligament to ligation of the uterine artery. Uterine weight of 500 g or more required a significantly longer operation time compared with uteri weighing less than 500 g (164 min vs 127 min median, p <.001), and there was more blood loss (100 mL vs 50 mL median, p <.001). There were no differences in the median intramuscular meperidine requirements or hospital stay between the two groups. No blood transfusion was needed in either group, even in patients with a uterine weight of more than 1000 g. By regression analysis, uterine weight was significantly related to blood loss and operation time. A linear relationship was found among uterine weight, operation time, and blood loss: Uterine weight = 87.589 + 1.881 x operation time + 0.48 x blood loss (R = 0.531, F = 35.694, degrees of freedom 184, p <.001). No complications related to RUL were observed, although two bladder injuries related to severe pelvic adhesion with endometriosis and previous cesarean section occurred.
Minimal blood loss and a low complication rate were noted in LAVH by uterine artery ligation through RUL. This technique should be a valid approach, especially in patients in whom minimal blood loss must be achieved.
评估在腹腔镜辅助下阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)中通过脐韧带逆行追踪法(RUL)结扎子宫动脉的临床效果。
前瞻性研究(加拿大工作组分类II - 3)。
大学附属医院。
225例患有子宫肌瘤或子宫腺肌病的女性。
采用腹腔镜辅助下阴式子宫切除术,通过RUL识别并结扎子宫动脉。
患者的中位年龄为46岁,切除子宫的中位重量为340 g,26.2%的子宫重量超过500 g。中位手术时间为135分钟,中位失血量为50 mL。肌内注射哌替啶的中位需求量为1支(50 mg),中位住院时间为3天。从识别脐韧带到结扎子宫动脉大约需要10分钟。与重量小于500 g的子宫相比,重量500 g及以上的子宫手术时间明显更长(中位时间分别为164分钟和127分钟,p <.001),失血量也更多(中位值分别为100 mL和50 mL,p <.001)。两组在肌内注射哌替啶的中位需求量或住院时间方面无差异。两组均无需输血,即使子宫重量超过1000 g的患者也是如此。通过回归分析,子宫重量与失血量和手术时间显著相关。发现子宫重量、手术时间和失血量之间存在线性关系:子宫重量 = 87.589 + 1.881×手术时间 + 0.48×失血量(R = 0.531,F = 35.694,自由度184,p <.001)。尽管发生了2例与严重盆腔粘连(子宫内膜异位症和既往剖宫产史)相关的膀胱损伤,但未观察到与RUL相关的并发症。
在LAVH中通过RUL结扎子宫动脉时,失血量少且并发症发生率低。该技术应是一种有效的方法,尤其适用于必须实现最少失血量的患者。