Udesky Julia O, Spence Nicole Z, Achiel Ron, Lee Chrisitane, Flood Pamela
Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Anesth Analg. 2005 Aug;101(2):407-411. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000155291.81338.90.
Several anesthetic drugs are nicotinic antagonists at or below levels used for anesthesia, including ketamine and volatile anesthetics. In contrast, propofol does not inhibit nicotinic receptors. To determine the potential behavioral ramifications of nicotinic inhibition by ketamine, we determined the doses of ketamine required to induce immobility, impair the righting reflex, and cause analgesia in the absence and presence of several nicotinic ligands. Propofol was used as a control in similar experiments. When used as a sole anesthetic drug, 383 +/- 22 mg/kg ketamine intraperitoneally (IP) was required for immobility and 180 +/- 17 mg/kg IP impaired righting reflex. Propofol, 371 +/- 34 mg/kg IP, induced immobility whereas 199 mg/kg IP inhibited the righting reflex. Nicotinic antagonists had no effect on the dose of propofol or ketamine required for either end-point. When nociceptive responses were tested at subhypnotic doses, no pronociceptive or antinociceptive phase was identified for propofol, whereas analgesia was induced at ketamine doses larger than 60 mg/kg IP. The broad-spectrum nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine enhanced the analgesic action of ketamine. These findings are different than those seen with volatile anesthetics, where nicotinic inhibition is thought to be responsible for a pronociceptive action. Such a phase is possibly obscured by analgesia induced as a result of N-methyl-d-aspartic acid antagonism by ketamine.
Ketamine and volatile anesthetics, but not propofol, inhibit neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in clinically relevant concentration ranges. Nicotinic inhibition by ketamine is not related to its immobilizing or sedating effects but may play a role in ketamine's analgesic action.
几种麻醉药物在用于麻醉的剂量及以下时是烟碱拮抗剂,包括氯胺酮和挥发性麻醉剂。相比之下,丙泊酚不抑制烟碱受体。为了确定氯胺酮对烟碱的抑制作用可能产生的行为影响,我们测定了在有无几种烟碱配体的情况下,诱导氯胺酮所致不动、损害翻正反射及产生镇痛作用所需的氯胺酮剂量。在类似实验中使用丙泊酚作为对照。当作为唯一麻醉药物使用时,腹腔注射(IP)383±22mg/kg氯胺酮可诱导不动,180±17mg/kg IP可损害翻正反射。IP 371±34mg/kg丙泊酚可诱导不动,而199mg/kg IP可抑制翻正反射。烟碱拮抗剂对达到任一终点所需的丙泊酚或氯胺酮剂量均无影响。当在亚催眠剂量下测试伤害性反应时,未发现丙泊酚有促伤害性或抗伤害性阶段,而氯胺酮剂量大于60mg/kg IP时可诱导镇痛。广谱烟碱拮抗剂美加明增强了氯胺酮的镇痛作用。这些发现与挥发性麻醉剂的情况不同,挥发性麻醉剂的烟碱抑制作用被认为是促伤害性作用的原因。由于氯胺酮对N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸的拮抗作用而诱导的镇痛作用可能掩盖了这样一个阶段。
氯胺酮和挥发性麻醉剂在临床相关浓度范围内可抑制神经元烟碱型乙酰胆碱受体,但丙泊酚不会。氯胺酮对烟碱的抑制作用与其致不动或镇静作用无关,但可能在氯胺酮的镇痛作用中起作用。