Kisdi Eva, Utz Margarete
Department of Mathematics, University of Turku, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland.
Theor Popul Biol. 2005 Aug;68(2):133-45. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2005.06.001.
In metapopulations, competitive interactions may extend beyond the confines of the local population such that members of neighbouring habitat patches affect each other adversely (quasi-local competition). We derive a model for quasi-local competition from first principles, assuming that individuals compete for shared resources and members of a population spend a certain fraction of their foraging time in the adjacent populations. Contrary to the results of Doebeli and Killingback [2003. Theor. Popul. Biol. 64, 397-416], our model does not produce spatial patterns of population densities in homogeneous environments. Quasi-local competition nevertheless contributes to pattern formation by amplifying the effect of heterogeneities in the external environment, and this amplification can be extremely strong when dispersal is absent. We discuss why apparently similar models lead to contrasting results.
在集合种群中,竞争相互作用可能会超出局部种群的范围,使得相邻栖息地斑块的成员相互产生不利影响(准局部竞争)。我们从第一原理推导出一个准局部竞争模型,假设个体竞争共享资源,且种群中的成员将一定比例的觅食时间花费在相邻种群中。与Doebeli和Killingback [2003年。《理论种群生物学》64卷,397 - 416页] 的结果相反,我们的模型在均匀环境中不会产生种群密度的空间格局。然而,准局部竞争通过放大外部环境异质性的影响有助于格局形成,并且当不存在扩散时,这种放大作用可能会极其强烈。我们讨论了为什么看似相似的模型会导致截然不同的结果。