Pouillès J M, Trémollières F, Ribot C
Service d'Endocrinologie, U.F. Maladies Osseuses et Métaboliques, Hôpital Purpan, Toulouse.
Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. 1992 Feb;59(2):103-13.
Thirty seven postmenopausal women aged under 65 with densitometric osteoporosis defined by a bone density value below the 80th percentile of the osteoporotic population but without identifiable crush fractures, were treated and monitored for two years using clinical, laboratory and densitometric parameters. Sixteen of them were given hormonal replacement therapy combining percutaneous or transdermal 17 beta estradiol with a progestogen and the other 21 sodium fluoride at the dose of 50 mg/d combined with calcium and vitamin D. There was a significant increase in vertebral bone density in both groups: 6.3 +/- 0.9 per cent for hormone treatment and 7.1 +/- 1.5% for fluoride after 2 years, while it fell in a control group. The increase was linear with fluoride, while 2/3 of the gain was acquired by the end of the first year of hormonal therapy. Nine of the 16 patients on hormonal therapy and 9 of the 21 taking fluoride showed a significant vertebral gain at 2 years (greater than or equal to 0.043 g/cm2). There was no parameter which enabled the identification of "responders" before treatment. There was no difference in changes in femoral bone density between patients treated with fluoride and controls. From a laboratory standpoint, hormonal therapy caused a significant fall at 12 months in the urinary calcium/urinary creatinine ratio, and a non-significant fall in osteocalcin at 2 years. With fluoride, there was a marked rise in osteocalcin and a more moderate rise in alkaline phosphatase, reflecting stimulation of bone formation without any variation in resorption. In conclusion, this study shows the ability of both these types of treatment of increasing, by different mechanisms, the vertebral bone density of osteoporotic women. However, it does not indicate the extent to which this gain in bone density might have a positive influence on fracture risk.
37名65岁以下绝经后女性,其骨密度值低于骨质疏松人群第80百分位数,被定义为存在密度测定骨质疏松症,但无明显压缩性骨折,使用临床、实验室和骨密度参数进行了两年的治疗和监测。其中16名接受激素替代疗法,将经皮或经皮17β雌二醇与孕激素联合使用,另外21名服用剂量为50mg/d的氟化钠,并联合钙和维生素D。两组患者的椎骨骨密度均显著增加:激素治疗组2年后增加6.3±0.9%,氟化物治疗组增加7.1±1.5%,而对照组则下降。氟化物治疗组骨密度增加呈线性,而激素治疗组在第一年结束时获得了2/3的增加量。16名接受激素治疗的患者中有9名,21名服用氟化物的患者中有9名在2年后椎骨骨密度显著增加(大于或等于0.043g/cm²)。治疗前没有参数能够识别“反应者”。接受氟化物治疗的患者与对照组在股骨骨密度变化方面没有差异。从实验室角度来看,激素治疗在12个月时导致尿钙/尿肌酐比值显著下降,在2年时骨钙素下降不显著。使用氟化物时,骨钙素显著升高,碱性磷酸酶升高较为适度,反映出对骨形成的刺激,而骨吸收没有任何变化。总之,本研究表明这两种治疗方法都能够通过不同机制增加骨质疏松女性的椎骨骨密度。然而,它并未表明这种骨密度增加对骨折风险产生积极影响的程度。